From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF04A034E; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:34:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F06D42744; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:34:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F6140042 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:34:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AFB5C0223; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 05:34:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Jan 2022 05:34:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; bh=SlPe5xsdesDxYJ StAFL6ignIh0BQedSxi80D/6Poi2o=; b=Rnm5ICHSWZ/GZrHVr65YNwN9PrRR5d 4cr7JOwz5D54Y6QYFL2Ttl9IFBkZ7ObhfgToRF30TM9YvpXscoDu0R32P+IrfgJ2 n6KXh7zwKYQqsvGt7nrhC/IfSb68RDw9gMWOWPzAwqmK6hZRno69reK4mUZ1JNxu 31iM2a7mxXyppeYWWaMaRbq7og3sSTUSfbU0yPcIttR9V+5GPPeT5s+69DNmhLhG IrzLvCrh16WrusImIJK3q1DyVEicd9oXgUuoNM0WwZUbeWC4yeV2atXSk/ND5Xcj bdFbvqWZkhdXwEi85U79ILH2xgpnLo1oVCgL5xGxuWWAvVj7mXGdIvcg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=SlPe5xsdesDxYJStAFL6ignIh0BQedSxi80D/6Poi 2o=; b=G/ESm6UedQHG20etEkn0vHvjyNaZWSWFiY6PLaQJLMYszkrH0fWV/r4Co O/nopX+YDX+6IntxXP7GylOcvoQH1U0XViaKSmFxsay31ax1GsSwM324NPMLeRtc OkRICCFlCOCE3rLFFkqgQAejqPBn5b8bPCiaHs50scf3KOahysjgbEpjh2PumjCj 3RtSY7HBkCmDBa2gISqoUf1iqLcRKVz9S6KBI9CKCYVTRX72o1k19NwFJsgNwcZe jzp1cvpES+I9VYUO39R+1FCklHv7SKqVAmvwwVNZ9tBCbCmz2D6w/wKO86C7Ivah i6t/qiBLW1axfPUFVonQJ3tISkNIA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrvddtgddukecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 05:34:45 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Elena Agostini Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpudev: mem alloc aligned memory Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:34:43 +0100 Message-ID: <2189445.AOvM4ru3NT@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20220108002003.21153-1-eagostini@nvidia.com> References: <20220104014721.1799-1-eagostini@nvidia.com> <20220108002003.21153-1-eagostini@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 08/01/2022 01:20, eagostini@nvidia.com: > From: Elena Agostini > > Similarly to rte_malloc, rte_gpu_mem_alloc accept as > input the memory alignment size. > > GPU driver should return GPU memory address aligned > with the input value. > > Changelog: > - rte_gpu_mem_alloc parameters order > > Signed-off-by: Elena Agostini Squashed and applied, thanks.