From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1ABB41C49; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:31:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA1E40EE4; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:31:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9A540ED9 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:31:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEAE32009B1; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:31:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:31:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1676374265; x= 1676460665; bh=1RIhYurbOnx4sYCPY5UjbGb2NlQxRsWtQVv3dK9ihos=; b=S JE9wFDYxwl1tJnDI1YOPduthULTML0AJgF04CuZDmTe5F0xZmjdiyWt/XrTcK5Tj cZD+LRNUhF2F5L0wsYmh6e0MFCRxBjq1cpbvQNoR25TEf0rz945jw7Mh2d46Gr01 qEPSL6NahLCCnDZiKrjVT15mLw92s3l8ndd0uMVa6JFuQQ/tfTaRvs+rd9oRCyHj ekgey+0/LH/91vJFi9QczwZ785FT0lIlRrkdsjdk0+MrTH1/DNGtrdLmoVGun5pp BWmM42D7uhXo9OcewjCp+BXGLlTFNHvst459+qbooCsamIhSz7AbaTM9Fx08dEbL OWBQsHYLHuQXSdzy6G5rQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1676374265; x= 1676460665; bh=1RIhYurbOnx4sYCPY5UjbGb2NlQxRsWtQVv3dK9ihos=; b=D P2LW2rhi22T3fDR4HbllqvjNMcbxA/W2gGIFWwfFuj44y6VQtHk2lN9p+sLVG6qm foWJjhdK9fhr27+6raTR8WXUUyTt1kTnBfMJX7EMOsK6pVZaKLCXZLvQP5g4mZrK fJLzQILRnayctXJ6oU0UV8QSjP4PY88dyy6AlWTx4j1VCpR8UJpfAIDN3xenMvCu mDX/wH5zTd/izSGXGDtg7QcDhsgk3Le4UjIQ/ad6ft4dKrI67EICA09c9g2KGb5q KiZNs2c7BWg5YKfm+SL6Np7L/DHWEUDn61PCivzP6Vaoo1AprHTMqLp1z8QZJRBO gM7Cnp7jiqp4lDyFyFedA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudeifedgvdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtjeeiieefhedtfffgvdelteeufeefheeujefgueetfedttdei kefgkeduhedtgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:31:04 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: David Marchand , Luca Boccassi , Bruce Richardson , John McNamara , Maxime Coquelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: rebuild all Sphinx guides Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:31:03 +0100 Message-ID: <2216421.3ZeAukHxDK@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2628508.q0ZmV6gNhb@thomas> References: <20230207084352.3325416-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <2628508.q0ZmV6gNhb@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 07/02/2023 10:09, Thomas Monjalon: > 07/02/2023 09:54, David Marchand: > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 9:44 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > > On some systems, Sphinx is lazy enough to not recompile an RST file, > > > even if it contains a link pointing to a file which has been removed. > > > > > > In order to detect such broken links, > > > the option "-a" is used to always rebuild all. > > > > I can't reproduce such behavior, but the principle looks ok to me and > > I did not notice a difference in terms of time spending generating the > > documentation. > > I think your system behaves with -a option forced somewhere. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > > We have no guide describing Sphinx, I'd rather update this patch title > > like "doc: rebuild all guides with Sphinx". > > Yes > > > Reviewed-by: David Marchand Applied