From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536AC2B9E for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:26:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id c200so257294474wme.0 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:26:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=4dbTIr4Z/5PYqUn8krlZSfjISTBNrnOMpV9El2JnJNo=; b=WIC0qVmfWcB5zQp8kaAEXabbdDpFy/NEMgKy8FeA48i4W76WuiKY2wn4XxFzthFgyG uPb8dwpCJnoZut4sOD5p80YZsEk//Cp6FHm5xgAeQ/ZFTa2XkNB/HbdYQVkOmfnX9dq3 5O/Ff0kaUgXIV0feHT3Zjn4sATRMtNiLJdlVVLeva5EsceZrmDDoPPnG1t7dUFCBHdEG lh5FxFPylVMWdQJAMLBB62NgSog1tHwGINFtriYLp/ew/Pg+nydAll4A7n1hBtqCCsTT MWtlCvPOatEugeBSWxSHbUnZM4HkdKLFOiN9mMjUk+8mqBtVxAjdoJrDVq15z0kdPpzH V5JQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=4dbTIr4Z/5PYqUn8krlZSfjISTBNrnOMpV9El2JnJNo=; b=NIInlwOD7zqz46RkmTs1+wCpL4XXgZUVECX7QaoY/3w6wvf/XIwhXU9Uy0EysPnvXp hpuenPaWcdSR/5zIievM93pzOXuhIwVunvg9BaytaDekIwjevnytpJm+Cu/1BmgP3AQq +Xo+ZZ3F/gLRIdlxVLVcOdLg4fZcBHgvsBaRDoEPSKPmJHOWgB/Ln14PGElfq3A48UqO l1be2y41Ft+DN4N0YcAWFF396oiXiUY1Zjapnre/V3XvYI/NTYxmo+W4PCd/Q0gxUOkT GCm2erXON5EB+W/nDHAIdMwLPvw6ZCySHh4GOx2LdEl+BPEdfXk+U8oHa14Z+we8AL/5 9Y5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTyarvFe4V2i05l/vgdooA4gnJ5rkkyCjdCzsy/WUP7BXJBeDkUPCPy7bmCBQr8zrhS X-Received: by 10.28.188.195 with SMTP id m186mr21696213wmf.64.1456302368169; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:26:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (171.36.101.84.rev.sfr.net. [84.101.36.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j10sm1749110wjb.46.2016.02.24.00.26.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:26:07 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Kantecki, Tomasz" Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:24:33 +0100 Message-ID: <2221343.vDGpEpgp97@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <91026831.UvMIbM9v17@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL extension X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:26:08 -0000 2016-02-23 23:03, Kantecki, Tomasz: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > If there is nothing specific in DPDK for PQos, why writing an example in > > DPDK? > The example makes it much easier to use the technology with DPDK. > > > Maybe the example should be better in the library itself. > The library in question (https://github.com/01org/intel-cmt-cat) has a couple of examples but none of them refers to DPDK. > > > I suggest to mention the library in > > doc/guides/linux_gsg/nic_perf_intel_platform.rst > Ok it can be added to this document. Does it imply -1 for the sample code idea? I may be wrong but I have the feeling the example is more about PQoS than DPDK. So yes, I would vote -1.