From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536AC2B9E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:26:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id c200so257294474wme.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:26:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-type; bh=4dbTIr4Z/5PYqUn8krlZSfjISTBNrnOMpV9El2JnJNo=;
 b=WIC0qVmfWcB5zQp8kaAEXabbdDpFy/NEMgKy8FeA48i4W76WuiKY2wn4XxFzthFgyG
 uPb8dwpCJnoZut4sOD5p80YZsEk//Cp6FHm5xgAeQ/ZFTa2XkNB/HbdYQVkOmfnX9dq3
 5O/Ff0kaUgXIV0feHT3Zjn4sATRMtNiLJdlVVLeva5EsceZrmDDoPPnG1t7dUFCBHdEG
 lh5FxFPylVMWdQJAMLBB62NgSog1tHwGINFtriYLp/ew/Pg+nydAll4A7n1hBtqCCsTT
 MWtlCvPOatEugeBSWxSHbUnZM4HkdKLFOiN9mMjUk+8mqBtVxAjdoJrDVq15z0kdPpzH
 V5JQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=4dbTIr4Z/5PYqUn8krlZSfjISTBNrnOMpV9El2JnJNo=;
 b=NIInlwOD7zqz46RkmTs1+wCpL4XXgZUVECX7QaoY/3w6wvf/XIwhXU9Uy0EysPnvXp
 hpuenPaWcdSR/5zIievM93pzOXuhIwVunvg9BaytaDekIwjevnytpJm+Cu/1BmgP3AQq
 +Xo+ZZ3F/gLRIdlxVLVcOdLg4fZcBHgvsBaRDoEPSKPmJHOWgB/Ln14PGElfq3A48UqO
 l1be2y41Ft+DN4N0YcAWFF396oiXiUY1Zjapnre/V3XvYI/NTYxmo+W4PCd/Q0gxUOkT
 GCm2erXON5EB+W/nDHAIdMwLPvw6ZCySHh4GOx2LdEl+BPEdfXk+U8oHa14Z+we8AL/5
 9Y5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTyarvFe4V2i05l/vgdooA4gnJ5rkkyCjdCzsy/WUP7BXJBeDkUPCPy7bmCBQr8zrhS
X-Received: by 10.28.188.195 with SMTP id m186mr21696213wmf.64.1456302368169; 
 Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:26:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (171.36.101.84.rev.sfr.net. [84.101.36.171])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j10sm1749110wjb.46.2016.02.24.00.26.07
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:26:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Kantecki, Tomasz" <tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:24:33 +0100
Message-ID: <2221343.vDGpEpgp97@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <E79CF84CF47B0B42B66F4F5835125F9C817B3340@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <E79CF84CF47B0B42B66F4F5835125F9C817B2425@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <91026831.UvMIbM9v17@xps13>
 <E79CF84CF47B0B42B66F4F5835125F9C817B3340@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL
	extension
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:26:08 -0000

2016-02-23 23:03, Kantecki, Tomasz:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > If there is nothing specific in DPDK for PQos, why writing an example in
> > DPDK?
> The example makes it much easier to use the technology with DPDK.
> 
> > Maybe the example should be better in the library itself.
> The library in question (https://github.com/01org/intel-cmt-cat) has a couple of examples but none of them refers to DPDK.
> 
> > I suggest to mention the library in
> > doc/guides/linux_gsg/nic_perf_intel_platform.rst
> Ok it can be added to this document. Does it imply -1 for the sample code idea?

I may be wrong but I have the feeling the example is more about PQoS than DPDK.
So yes, I would vote -1.