DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>,
	Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	Rasesh Mody <rasesh.mody@cavium.com>,
	Harish Patil <harish.patil@cavium.com>,
	Shahed Shaikh <shahed.shaikh@cavium.com>,
	Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] drivers/net: do not redefine bool
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 21:16:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2226451.sCb16aOFOU@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d72af01-ec77-0d5f-12a7-9a612f06982a@intel.com>

03/10/2018 16:11, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 9/25/2018 10:04 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 25/09/2018 10:03, Ferruh Yigit:
> >> On 9/24/2018 5:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> >>>>> @@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts,
> >>>>>  		struct ixgbe_rx_entry *next_rxe = NULL;
> >>>>>  		struct rte_mbuf *first_seg;
> >>>>>  		struct rte_mbuf *rxm;
> >>>>> -		struct rte_mbuf *nmb;
> >>>>> +		struct rte_mbuf *nmb = NULL;
> >>>>
> >>>> This change is unrelated. Can we separate this one?
> >>>
> >>> Yes it looks unrelated but it becomes necessary when including stdbool.h.
> >>> I don't know the root cause, but yes, it may deserve a separate commit.
> >>> Maybe an ixgbe maintainer can take care of it?
> >>
> >> Why becomes necessary? Does it give a build warning etc?
> >> My concern is this is in data path, one extra assignment, it would be better to
> >> confirm it is really needed.
> > 
> > Yes I had a compilation error.
> > If you cannot reproduce it, I will try to re-run my compilation tests.
> 
> I got the error with gcc [1] but it seems false positive and only generated when
> <stdbool.h> included in ixgbe_rxtx.c, so this is an odd one, I am not able to
> find root cause.
> 
> But since it is false positive, what do you think adding compiler option to
> disable this warning for this file?

I don't like disabling warnings on files.
We can take time to work on this patch. It is not required for 18.11.


> [1]
> .../drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:2139:14: error: ‘nmb’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>     rxe->mbuf = nmb;
>     ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> 
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 8.1.1 20180712 (Red Hat 8.1.1-5)

      reply	other threads:[~2018-10-03 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-20  0:18 Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-20 17:48 ` Shaikh, Shahed
2018-09-21 13:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-09-21 14:49   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-24 14:43     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-09-24 15:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-09-24 16:59   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-25  8:03     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-09-25  9:04       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-03 14:11         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-03 19:16           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2226451.sCb16aOFOU@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=harish.patil@cavium.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
    --cc=rasesh.mody@cavium.com \
    --cc=shahed.shaikh@cavium.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=yongwang@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).