From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C66A0562; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:53:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198F4161A74; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:53:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98174013F for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:53:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371DD58058A; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:53:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:53:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= mfy3M/THYJGVKj1upNsxgasLffBGW/YJ+Olb+ESVvrw=; b=JYXHv0LtB5hiKhzA V4chDubRxLJZiPJHpfG1WFkHLgsxqtYqJx8Xa5fksOiuMBzytLgf5hKhqoJER7r1 xlv7ncALD+mo9FbuRx2R0H7qfeyf8AD41qG3VYmAnG4LV+iq+59KtJ25IEnsAwW9 nvL/ZreuoSQHedeArWv/r8jHA0aGpjLXHBM0yqUSAvvb1RBJVDrwkCTxv2f1jrGB 4/O/CxJ4cmqrtZNVlWMOrplz/9vH7hG3r5S+2qGoZGg5knM26W8wWdVkM0x1RCQ1 UPruHDKlRuar6vof4v/pwmjI/5whbY7MduuHxq6pxE8D12QH+rzmMGU5znjtkdVl b91Mxg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=mfy3M/THYJGVKj1upNsxgasLffBGW/YJ+Olb+ESVv rw=; b=iX1pP+B1xWoTwL1XC3UAEHfsls/Ffc88HaZ2tWPOTjzid/4yg9l1g3KVc YCsxZIBqBe8GGSxyWda2GSnEURikzuEezgc5+hENOIzDFwCETrCcMEl9KN3Crq/P nSRxofJJP/JFLnmNNEmNXz6FxOPpMOgNretRU2HmatZ15qTLVZc5zXLTdS0ywxWt CWUMe97jlP2UbnYQej8u/tALCUzXWWI7QBB6CnhbfVtthGlUbBkqY9GtH64Zsiv0 swpl2BP4o07yhi/HPaxNGz2Mplvhu0F8e0R9h4gNLXLqGxwcYIG0/CZiuHvalSbF JMzOMiEUfvr1PwGN0/iiTs1bJbXcQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeluddgheejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 682EF1080064; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:53:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Akhil Goyal Cc: jerinj@marvell.com, dev@dpdk.org, mdr@ashroe.eu, david.marchand@redhat.com, abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, nipun.gupta@nxp.com, sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com, anoobj@marvell.com, matan@nvidia.com, roy.fan.zhang@intel.com, g.singh@nxp.com, erik.g.carrillo@intel.com, jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com, pbhagavatula@marvell.com, harry.van.haaren@intel.com, sthotton@marvell.com Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:53:41 +0200 Message-ID: <2242749.yNUvgHzJfl@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210414122036.1262579-5-gakhil@marvell.com> References: <561328fb16b18404a30a2401c6bfb3a7f373a0f4.1618309291.git.sthotton@marvell.com> <20210414122036.1262579-1-gakhil@marvell.com> <20210414122036.1262579-5-gakhil@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] devtools: add exception for reserved fields X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 14/04/2021 14:20, gakhil@marvell.com: > From: Akhil Goyal > > Certain structures are added with reserved fields > to address any future enhancements to retain ABI > compatibility. > However, ABI script will still report error as it > is not aware of reserved fields. Hence, adding a > generic exception for reserved fields. > > Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal > --- > devtools/libabigail.abignore | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/devtools/libabigail.abignore b/devtools/libabigail.abignore > index 46a5a6af5..a9d284f76 100644 > --- a/devtools/libabigail.abignore > +++ b/devtools/libabigail.abignore > @@ -25,3 +25,7 @@ > [suppress_type] > name = rte_eventdev > has_data_member_inserted_between = {offset_after(attached), end} > + > +; Ignore changes in reserved fields > +[suppress_variable] > + name_regexp = reserved If we do that as first patch of this series, we don't need the exception on rte_eventdev, right?