From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D7DA0350; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:48:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D076F1BF7F; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:48:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661041BF7B; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:48:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10855803F4; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:48:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:48:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= eAd0VcFMg9+d0l0UAaf+7sChZ7l+v0V5kzKc3SnBrVo=; b=t6YnjaHhO09xMXiz SbnVeyeYK7Oc1UUaxCKbnDK3l/4c9tr+FJnZ4ofhg+/RmaWElRffLqOlxHBLvO70 JOcEaq+mE3+HRwfltgeHuQgU2ccRj0yTrWIaUuRjYBCeAc3960AQg7029Z+Iqe+2 vIRlq/4QFTnBXuso6LeTWSwJbj7p6M/QUrhNk1S41iMOUxLvgnVHn45Dfg86yXA/ J4UPI0vYirF0UA3odvseEIUAiSXonefIyTVhfFM+toye9k67/yjD8nOsyHpE34/n LnwWahhesASyfIoaQu3d3VfKo+uEl6qIIHR5HiKOQ081ARfG4qypCuTNbOBV6MW7 dsUc6w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=eAd0VcFMg9+d0l0UAaf+7sChZ7l+v0V5kzKc3SnBr Vo=; b=e75DvvVJGIa85uQMOWus+zBWjdOyZiQn6zxX4fCXlOgi6nuDZsCjqRCLi P1xZIbBxtYdTTSf8mkGD8+H3R77onTfLQ32CyOWisdl+cpO64De0/MVQBtR2ur/h gk8UIJTq7VMLNphfcQ/q3fROYDDCjVTBW66z0GTJI7C/u9be913n/dsp1bf++Nh2 wMWJIhBrfrhICu8S5wW4Ts58mE2RKqVId7wCaPNk1OBhJdJr0xB379pn7YcREX4S HxE54hVyEEBymFz+Igo9HEdTGX744OYO7bCit/9KrE/TQFcHs+AMPq4Ano7nb0rN p6p7Tv8UptUcV6xYO/Kuv+rs+72hw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrvddttddgvdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdvffejueetleefieeludduuefgteejleevfeekjeefieegheet ffdvkeefgedunecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrd dvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 68D1C328006A; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:48:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Liu Cc: dpdk-dev , dts@dpdk.org, Lincoln Lavoie , David Marchand , Ferruh Yigit , Andrew Rybchenko , Ori Kam , Ciara Power , Ivan Ilchenko , Hemant Agrawal , Stephen Hemminger , Raslan Darawsheh Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:48:14 +0200 Message-ID: <2250034.MpDbe8kn2E@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RSS Key Update Feature X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 29/06/2020 23:07, David Liu: > Hello all, > > I will be implementing a test in DTS for RSS Key Update. > http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/features.html#rss-key-update > > To my understanding, this feature will test the ability to configure the > hash key of the ports. If that is incorrect, please let me know. > > Configure the port RSS hash key in testpmd and check if the new key will be > kept. Test configure the hash key that is longer than the max length and > shorter than the max length. > > Then start sending in packets with different source and destination IP > addresses. Ensure the ports are still able to calculate the hash value from > the incoming packets. Updating the key should change the destination queue of the packets. By setting up multi-queue Rx and choosing IP addresses accordingly, you can see packets arriving on the expected queue. > Please let me know if there is anything else need to be tested, A related test could be to read the computed hash in the mbuf metadata.