From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683728E81 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:31:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so232970772wic.0 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:31:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=xRY7fwpOAbYMoNDh3K711xIHgMgjaLTBLR0f6SSdOU0=; b=xu16e6sm+VuwEpPyB8q2jWJnM6lVElXazxzHs16PQbk2HlFlYvY2vdzqqHrkrGXU8s vlJTj1WNDD+sXKKnkXa5fbKgThF+at9W9lGMRq2hQiU4M4vw1xlImOyjkI3yuI9yl+8r GZ+OgmHtxTg8FBTgzK5N51fqgfOPEcwSMM1FINMX5k3PGIV4y3uYl6KYyWaY6Slok1tZ uo1ek6g+8YKtSd2/rORpoziJZaOX+jLvz94OAmW0OWeXbGZpvMf6UJGi24O4HPIIEnWp zchS6e6jheYesbYpKXkd0TaBcgDvVxzlGOCWpUiycrm60FT3WBlosvRjW1dE/kLrpnp7 wHKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=xRY7fwpOAbYMoNDh3K711xIHgMgjaLTBLR0f6SSdOU0=; b=HZUR16ApGbulyaqeMmRbEn97gnMgBZjt+10bUmSxQWJz+yyHRaYzW4Uha2rnGqq1AG uTG1sFvWB0mzVOpIwJ08fEf0H5l/sOgtk2W5rQ/wN1eI2jZlBFRUTR+KKt+4IKkvHkku kJR1MbuFCZcWcONDNpKx9DBVgima558kwZIIPszUCCgYZRr6naOno8Qk/PTHsGAeA3/B zX1MZeXQkzVvmljMVnt0KGLj7xHVcxGMPbMRqXlqZmX3z/wLgZ6t5PMg9iuilvrmRJ/r VeOmKNEg2PaMCVOc2KaBGlEatusGsJVeq0WgqZxF6WONw22xuoxYGESPygm255AV+CGo LTzg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntYR4e1wFHgAsT99KE+KYeeiKFlqjq1WCsAgFK3fiG9zJLnOVmd2fnVONmRQWYUVTUREKW X-Received: by 10.194.184.207 with SMTP id ew15mr3109256wjc.99.1446136308179; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l1sm2593924wjx.13.2015.10.29.09.31.47 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:31:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Liu, Yong" Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:30:37 +0100 Message-ID: <22607203.7fcSgJEPLE@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E10F379B0@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E10F379B0@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] dpdk pre-patch testing introduction X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:31:48 -0000 2015-10-29 15:19, Liu, Yong: > So far, we only enabled one platform to run automatic testing. > This platform installed Fedora 20 with Linux 3.18.9 and Intel Niantic NIC. Thanks for offering this service. > Currently the patch testing only run unit test and basic function test on this platform. > It can make sure that new patch doesn't break original code and functions. > Due to coverage limitation, it can't verify the functionality of new patch. > If you want to verify your patch's new function, you need to check with tester and perform specific testing on it. > > Since platform limitation, we are not able to verify regression test on other NIC, Linux kernel. > We plan to add more platforms and support different NIC and kernels in the future. The mailing list for test report is open to others. Submitters are white-listed. Feel free to contribute with your own tests on your own platform. Some work is ongoing to track the test results from patchwork. https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/patchwork/2015-July/001363.html https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/patchwork/2015-July/001369.html