DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Joongi Kim <joongi@an.kaist.ac.kr>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Too verbose PMD init logs - intended or not?
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 11:13:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2261724.ecphA4QphE@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKOGY8Jih5ajOjneQD85ZTa=gj8rPWf2DgJJe=SgsuLTOE+gLQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

2015-05-13 08:47, Joongi Kim:
> Hello,
> I found that the following commit and post are conflicting with each other:
> 1)
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=23f91f32f2b119f1376488d87be2b80b078a945e
> 2) http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-April/016361.html
> Is there a consensus on how verbose PMD init processes should be?
> (i.e., Is this an intended behavior or a bug?)

Yes, debug logs should use the debug level. Simple :)

> I'd like to see if my ports are initialized, but not what memory addresses
> they are attached for each ring. (Most of PMD init logs are only useful
> when debugging!)
> 
> My configuration (.config) says CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_DEBUG_INIT=n and my
> program explicitly set the debug level to INFO by calling
> rte_set_log_level(), but *still* the ixgbe pmd generates a lot of
> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, ...) messages.

I guess you are not using the HEAD.
This commit should solve your problem:
	http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=23e4bf20a16d34

> For workaround, I'm currently roll-backing the commit 23f91f3 manually for
> my build and then it becomes silent.

Please confirm it's fixed in HEAD.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-13  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-13  8:47 Joongi Kim
2015-05-13  9:13 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2015-05-13 12:00   ` Joongi Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2261724.ecphA4QphE@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=joongi@an.kaist.ac.kr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).