From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.212.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00865680
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 13 May 2015 11:14:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so5590405wic.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 13 May 2015 02:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=R6/Jskzl2ZJml9y6JSCuesFJ7lJScRAx33cMIJADiNk=;
 b=g4aDbmcLHrG8IUUKEAKn77xmaMNKn+ihL6RIcjC+6tctJbtV1l2X+lYAl3T4iSar0p
 Ak/DY7Pt1v4sdahfGWSswicfe8bOnAZmbcdSTQUj9G3LNnVB2FUMrvPNBeQoyufwYb0X
 75IPz8ULDeEvgmlopuN0pDtt0TC7Rs4D6jrJPjTQFn6rFVzddEi820297hI+5tkd2QTY
 uRwRVCU/YnFIjEC3MSaywZ+2d7aIoKziWXVz81Nkp2ztrQxplJRAyrMXaBFkHu55kOIr
 QFGqVgbqSv4YR6SQGm/t+rTulOvD1PKwvOxrlduvdqXzD/Eff5II5W9is9EZaqXL9fNH
 gAJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmsD5rozuhPlKDcDXrTNfpflhE6GcrLhMULhuRneOEuA7iE1DEMDOzg+quBssEgLOyfpieF
X-Received: by 10.194.122.105 with SMTP id lr9mr38880539wjb.153.1431508452798; 
 Wed, 13 May 2015 02:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ew15sm6713409wjd.17.2015.05.13.02.14.11
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 13 May 2015 02:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Joongi Kim <joongi@an.kaist.ac.kr>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 11:13:29 +0200
Message-ID: <2261724.ecphA4QphE@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.7 (Linux/4.0.1-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.7; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAKOGY8Jih5ajOjneQD85ZTa=gj8rPWf2DgJJe=SgsuLTOE+gLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKOGY8Jih5ajOjneQD85ZTa=gj8rPWf2DgJJe=SgsuLTOE+gLQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Too verbose PMD init logs - intended or not?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:14:13 -0000

Hi,

2015-05-13 08:47, Joongi Kim:
> Hello,
> I found that the following commit and post are conflicting with each other:
> 1)
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=23f91f32f2b119f1376488d87be2b80b078a945e
> 2) http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-April/016361.html
> Is there a consensus on how verbose PMD init processes should be?
> (i.e., Is this an intended behavior or a bug?)

Yes, debug logs should use the debug level. Simple :)

> I'd like to see if my ports are initialized, but not what memory addresses
> they are attached for each ring. (Most of PMD init logs are only useful
> when debugging!)
> 
> My configuration (.config) says CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_DEBUG_INIT=n and my
> program explicitly set the debug level to INFO by calling
> rte_set_log_level(), but *still* the ixgbe pmd generates a lot of
> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, ...) messages.

I guess you are not using the HEAD.
This commit should solve your problem:
	http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=23e4bf20a16d34

> For workaround, I'm currently roll-backing the commit 23f91f3 manually for
> my build and then it becomes silent.

Please confirm it's fixed in HEAD.