From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1EBA0487 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 23:46:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68AB1BF9D; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 23:46:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C00A1BF64; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 23:46:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95117222C9; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:46:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:46:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=kV+1OvAyC5Z1BGMXHxWPFbIbhyBPXr2SmeFOfTrGXkE=; b=DDp66GgU6shh dDeTNxHi7K+EuuBNM/BEYcCAAr8AdxLjJN5jULqcVdEpp0gCzSamqjYcZghf6q2g R1jQciOFFO0VxQxkAh0GW76CqSx13qhjI1P1mxmUzreMNvW29O8Dbx562mztU3Of D6HKIiyuFTnLwc1BvPBT76XMLyF7yEY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=kV+1OvAyC5Z1BGMXHxWPFbIbhyBPXr2SmeFOfTrGX kE=; b=tUybusu1cYavSVcpepuc6RFH4sdfa4tWahEzq6PxoTLAZnFpQDDPJz2nL +RHB96jtBNmYCscGD0/Rrae/cHRYcgOVbLThgqSM42MTPFZDKnMwGzxpoO7vRnmj CYIHUFVwNRQEYxa8rQcwxDP71aa2XmaYxNrRl0odj6AZLbvE6E8AEfQexZ017Wzk Z0jES+wXZ5B5jhVNtR9HEmCLn845nKL3fhwFCuctCTKDd8vWlpBIon5uIzjO9s/B eHCAT7luesbgtkvlVTDibAPJKbZWq0Tz+XerY6xCTgrjxlCfknHrlAbgD9jeUmYH UzhRcesdfZB//FUoamTjPeLKA1fng== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrledvgddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3FC8D80059; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:46:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Sunil Kumar Kori Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "stable@dpdk.org" Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 23:46:08 +0200 Message-ID: <2265276.8h4lJIiHNK@xps> In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580168A5B0A2@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1564034330-16321-1-git-send-email-skori@marvell.com> <1564043050-28306-1-git-send-email-skori@marvell.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580168A5B0A2@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] examples/ip_frag: fix Tx fast free offload flag X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > Application uses different pool to allocate direct and indirect > > mbufs which are further spliced together to consturct a fragmented > > packet and same is transmitted over the port which is configured > > with DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE enabled i.e. all segments > > must belong to the same pool. But constructed packet violates > > the conditions. > > > > So fixing DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE flag during device > > configuration. > > > > Fixes: fdb9eff67f0c ("examples/ip_fragmentation: convert to new offloads API") > > > > Signed-off-by: Sunil Kumar Kori > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev Applied, thanks