From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0C0A0543; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 17:16:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B9B4021D; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 17:16:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88387400D6 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 17:16:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1671034591; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yYTDt6we6J1zvk4GGLsgHr6z/1AVIsKdzpXYy2ihyWk=; b=MblWDumlVkdwc9mjHQRF6WqSZfSaj4ZSU9qt4Wik0/VzrL9ZKwnt2kfvHKMINPqSCLQb8z 01bcpUtj6IbzKdoNSJARbq3ZqPmrfXpRDbRkS/hz6vPBXyCrdG2b02ntYA/IkA1dPFldlC u1cxg27ZfHiBoKmwCKGbsNSaY4bx+yY= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-558-efZyVle4M4y4uwIbL4Qulw-1; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:16:29 -0500 X-MC-Unique: efZyVle4M4y4uwIbL4Qulw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C6CB380610E; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.32] (unknown [10.39.208.32]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 429412166B26; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2265eafc-d8f9-5802-678a-5e7c5d4b75f4@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 17:16:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] test/bbdev: fix build issue with optional build flag To: Nicolas Chautru , dev@dpdk.org Cc: hernan.vargas@intel.com, Vipin.Varghese@amd.com, stable@dpdk.org References: <20221213161855.12970-1-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> <20221213161855.12970-3-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <20221213161855.12970-3-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 12/13/22 17:18, Nicolas Chautru wrote: > Missing implementation for offload test with FFT. > Only build when the optional build flag RTE_BBDEV_OFFLOAD_COST > is set. > > Fixes: 0acdb9866756 ("test/bbdev: add FFT operations cases") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru > --- > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) > Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin Thanks, Maxime