From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD9837A6 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:41:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so222772580wmw.1 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:41:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=8qDi6ux/N3sDfGlkqomT3WCLeQ1s8pdTf648Y/c+h7Q=; b=Xdiuo84CazDX9hwGPo8elRwc78RqZG/5KjzSpTi9WYPkYnCytWcv610zwS8UZOW9TA gMQGRrkZkUErOy0bdyXTUCOUHd6SZQekYjD6kN24AVph1J4cwRbrlpA/bZq7UbqVMOve 8aMmb0RLOk7cSImSJJs1Z8qE0c6qaAwRavkI8YrFKH+LV4l2PsdqS7GKEF/UZJy+d1DB XGSHKfWV7VLlszCnJzxd05eriKA1dOBuQvt9/D28At3LEpbKjTEXbg1pCk0CIUElzgQn gdMeQwEgylpDfxUIoxQi1sB9NY9N0uHZg8qOniDEEn/w+QkUxLXDZD5wknOeIxOso6KE SwrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=8qDi6ux/N3sDfGlkqomT3WCLeQ1s8pdTf648Y/c+h7Q=; b=KPeeQ0QhVfpf3iXUOgo9Fo8yyJKiTmcq20pMPmoXq3drbxafMaXOntwbfxjjYeqtPd Laebb3yqoM/Pk0htsLWE6b9N7+IP9i0u0tIqau6PnWlZ9tu3dU61WDPmpEpTkwivXHVH x+V0bk59rwiVTEUhFq6lKYvIGmUmrmdXYsvkkLTd7H+7Q304jjHD3aY7NFdCyU49K7NE l9Svdh4ZL8qKzLmrlR8yriS1qF+AQiiKgJxvWmCG3iUP8rOaUEWdz8hEswvAfcUBFXbY QMBQuTfIB66dwRXkHh7KUhDfOKw/pHTWtDTSkSEzK1VRuGjPJMzXoP1uWuX0Motw617K cLCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmI+OCXWz5nPp2zOjgUv9S8poLnDk0/NaW1fIbqY3zW2XC3i7cHZkpl2wEyyEc66mFH34na X-Received: by 10.28.224.86 with SMTP id x83mr7424592wmg.36.1449074483737; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:41:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q77sm3929144wmd.22.2015.12.02.08.41.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:41:23 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jerin Jacob Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:40:13 +0100 Message-ID: <2275492.7Tn0tJ2v06@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20151202143415.GA11757@localhost.localdomain> References: <1448995276-9599-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <20151202143415.GA11757@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] eal/arm: Enable lpm/table/pipeline libs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:41:25 -0000 2015-12-02 20:04, Jerin Jacob: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:13:51PM +0800, Jianbo Liu wrote: > > On 2 December 2015 at 18:39, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > AND they include "rte_lpm.h"(it internally includes rte_vect.h) > > > that lead to multiple definition and its not good. > > > > > But you will have similar issue since "typedef int32x4_t __m128i" > > appears in both your patch and this header file. > > I just tested it, it won't break, back to back "typedef int32x4_t __m128i" > is fine(unlike inline function). > > my intention to keep __m128i "as is" because changing the __m128i to rte_??? > something would break the ABI. Isn't it already broken in 2.2?