DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Kill off PCI dependencies
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 17:26:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2281378.PUPUsLso98@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170208145640.66deb7f0@xeon-e3>

2017-02-08 14:56, Stephen Hemminger:
> I am trying to make DPDK more agnostic about bus type. The existing API still
> has hardwired into that ethernet devices are either PCI or not PCI (ie pci_dev == NULL).
> Jan, Jerin, and Shreyansh started the process but it hasn't gone far enough.
> 
> It would make more sense if the existing generic device was used everywhere
> including rte_ethdev, rte_ethdev_info, etc.

Yes

> The ABI breakage is not catastrophic. Just change pci_dev to a device pointer.
> One option would be to use NEXT_ABI and/or two different calls and data structures.
> Messy but compatible. Something like
>     rte_dev_info_get returns rte_dev_info but is marked deprecated
>     rte_device_info_get returns rte_device_info

Or we can break the ABI to avoid messy code.

> One fallout is that the existing testpmd code makes lots of assumptions that
> is working with a PCI device. Things like ability to get/set PCI registers.
> I suspect this is already broken if one tries to run it on a virtual device like TAP.
> 
> Can we just turn off that functionality?

Which functionality exactly?

> Also KNI has more dependencies that ethernet devices are PCI.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-02-09 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-08 22:56 Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-09 16:26 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2281378.PUPUsLso98@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).