From: "Juraj Linkeš" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
To: jspewock@iol.unh.edu, npratte@iol.unh.edu,
yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, probb@iol.unh.edu,
wathsala.vithanage@arm.com, paul.szczepanek@arm.com,
Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com, alex.chapman@arm.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:58:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22a5f571-94ee-4c14-9434-2f5d0ffb476e@pantheon.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240923184235.22582-3-jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
On 23. 9. 2024 20:42, jspewock@iol.unh.edu wrote:
> From: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
>
> Previously in the DTS framework the helper methods in the TestSuite
> class designated ports as either ingress or egress ports and would wrap
> the methods of the traffic generator to allow packets to only flow to
> those designated ingress or egress ports. This is undesirable in some
> cases, such as when you have virtual functions on top of your port,
> where the TG ports can send to more than one SUT port. This patch
> solves this problem by creating optional parameters that allow the user
> to specify which port to gather the MAC addresses from when sending and
> receiving packets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
> ---
I'm not a fan of exposing the functionality in this way. The developers
needs to fiddle with ports and there are likely better ways to
accomplish this.
Ideally, the only information the dev would provide that a test case is
a VF test case and everything else would happen under the hood in the
TestCase class.
Barring that, we could decorate the whole TestSuite as requiring VFs,
which would result in automatically creating and removing the VFs in
setup/teardown (test case marking would be similar, but possibly more
complicated, especially if we wanted to abide only by test cases
selected in a given test run). Then the test cases could pass a simple
vf=True parameter to the send/receive methods.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-25 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 19:15 [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-08-21 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework Jeremy Spewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 " jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-09-25 8:45 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-09-25 10:58 ` Juraj Linkeš [this message]
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-09-25 11:28 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-09-25 12:05 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-09-25 13:29 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-25 8:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework Juraj Linkeš
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22a5f571-94ee-4c14-9434-2f5d0ffb476e@pantheon.tech \
--to=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com \
--cc=alex.chapman@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jspewock@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=npratte@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=paul.szczepanek@arm.com \
--cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
--cc=yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).