From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3A2A04B0; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 23:42:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD5C2C54; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 23:42:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17B92C39 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 23:42:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C4B5C00CF; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:42:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 07 Aug 2020 17:42:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= Go8d8Y47u/7oGFygsZOgjidhQpqImAJDM94/Rx7MWXY=; b=CYnEEnoyIabZB0Vy /yGpaPWl/pBMkTiEs6uLcPjJkB2Rf5+1143lcpj1w6iti8WTHtgRr1IRdgKNhko/ wZKt2N/X35bS+SY3MvJ2iHp2j4IsS3Lq63bp+cKmdaD5dP25zNYxReF8qJzeZabk a69YmXoxORBbflvCLedRgN9lkeeHTuyqfGWfQ0dE1CNBXmfMhm4dUvdxP4DohDOX 9Rmx8jZvBRfYVsKgFj6eIQwebx7cxFqpdMKGyDHZH5GyQ3/soY6IrtaVGX2hnV98 K3iy4wys0KAcGKYDpp9b2fHLRH+VDwlqFRsHrPhqV7sxVg1yGeJjW4xO9kGajXe5 rqNJ4Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Go8d8Y47u/7oGFygsZOgjidhQpqImAJDM94/Rx7MW XY=; b=Zhz9g0RNMggPu8ZSsmDkQuPhGLg1pDnnLOnKz4sSxlqKTOBWTgU2u3uqI PHY4dBxsB1ccwk8iZd7CRONKVBFtRLN5eaScWOK8pIkiOJfXG+RCDXHstCENZJWK Hze7irvgP+CpTisyIt1tcxnuxuWWt4qeJ7AzXWIJQRy67qm1IiDEXZQ+00+qokB/ BTPrQcs2uE68KZK5FfZgV8mVZqmpgWXVFsai1KX/EOh6IaDdZ8JwStNAE9fdeBAF YkIftREpHp9RQHUnRI/oMwaKAeH92riWIiUoMKb4SiRsOshCcO/iHVPYX28X4w89 nAmVBTU6nuovbJhexQME7P089IAdg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrkeefgddtudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeehteff vdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeelfedriedrudegle druddugeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7DD453280060; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:42:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Chengchang Tang Cc: dev@dpdk.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, Ferruh Yigit , Viacheslav Ovsiienko Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 23:42:17 +0200 Message-ID: <2309729.UfS7YTpr3K@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2d1a46c2-f447-d248-3432-f5f3f0a90cc4@intel.com> References: <1596619484-19714-1-git-send-email-tangchengchang@huawei.com> <1596796252-39897-1-git-send-email-tangchengchang@huawei.com> <2d1a46c2-f447-d248-3432-f5f3f0a90cc4@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: add new field to rxq info struct X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 07/08/2020 12:35, Ferruh Yigit: > On 8/7/2020 11:30 AM, Chengchang Tang wrote: > > Struct rte_eth_rxq_info will be modified to include a new field, indicating > > the size of each buffer that could be used for HW to receive packets. Add > > this field to rte_eth_rxq_info to expose relevant information to upper > > layer users/application. > > > > For more details: > > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-July/176135.html > > > > Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang > > Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko > > Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko > > --- > > +* ethdev: The ``struct rte_eth_rxq_info`` struct will be modified to include > > + a new optional field, indicating the buffer size used in receiving packets > > + for HW. This change is planned for 20.11. For more details: > > + https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-July/176135.html. > > Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit I think this notice is useless as the struct has __rte_cache_min_aligned. Others have approved, so Applied