* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section
@ 2019-04-05 20:30 Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-05 20:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-06-14 7:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2019-04-05 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger
The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic
order but running sort showed several mistakes.
This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise.
Purely for humans.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map | 36 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
index d6e375135ad1..33f2c303a361 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
@@ -277,6 +277,14 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
rte_class_unregister;
rte_ctrl_thread_create;
rte_delay_us_sleep;
+ rte_devargs_add;
+ rte_devargs_dump;
+ rte_devargs_insert;
+ rte_devargs_next;
+ rte_devargs_parse;
+ rte_devargs_parsef;
+ rte_devargs_remove;
+ rte_devargs_type_count;
rte_dev_dma_map;
rte_dev_dma_unmap;
rte_dev_event_callback_process;
@@ -289,14 +297,6 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
rte_dev_is_probed;
rte_dev_iterator_init;
rte_dev_iterator_next;
- rte_devargs_add;
- rte_devargs_dump;
- rte_devargs_insert;
- rte_devargs_next;
- rte_devargs_parse;
- rte_devargs_parsef;
- rte_devargs_remove;
- rte_devargs_type_count;
rte_eal_cleanup;
rte_extmem_attach;
rte_extmem_detach;
@@ -306,19 +306,19 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
rte_fbarray_destroy;
rte_fbarray_detach;
rte_fbarray_dump_metadata;
- rte_fbarray_find_idx;
rte_fbarray_find_biggest_free;
rte_fbarray_find_biggest_used;
+ rte_fbarray_find_contig_free;
+ rte_fbarray_find_contig_used;
+ rte_fbarray_find_idx;
rte_fbarray_find_next_free;
- rte_fbarray_find_next_used;
rte_fbarray_find_next_n_free;
rte_fbarray_find_next_n_used;
+ rte_fbarray_find_next_used;
rte_fbarray_find_prev_free;
- rte_fbarray_find_prev_used;
rte_fbarray_find_prev_n_free;
rte_fbarray_find_prev_n_used;
- rte_fbarray_find_contig_free;
- rte_fbarray_find_contig_used;
+ rte_fbarray_find_prev_used;
rte_fbarray_find_rev_biggest_free;
rte_fbarray_find_rev_biggest_used;
rte_fbarray_find_rev_contig_free;
@@ -346,24 +346,24 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
rte_mem_event_callback_register;
rte_mem_event_callback_unregister;
rte_mem_iova2virt;
- rte_mem_set_dma_mask;
- rte_mem_virt2memseg;
- rte_mem_virt2memseg_list;
rte_memseg_contig_walk;
rte_memseg_contig_walk_thread_unsafe;
rte_memseg_get_fd;
rte_memseg_get_fd_offset;
- rte_memseg_get_fd_thread_unsafe;
rte_memseg_get_fd_offset_thread_unsafe;
+ rte_memseg_get_fd_thread_unsafe;
rte_memseg_list_walk;
rte_memseg_list_walk_thread_unsafe;
rte_memseg_walk;
rte_memseg_walk_thread_unsafe;
+ rte_mem_set_dma_mask;
+ rte_mem_virt2memseg;
+ rte_mem_virt2memseg_list;
rte_mp_action_register;
rte_mp_action_unregister;
rte_mp_reply;
- rte_mp_request_sync;
rte_mp_request_async;
+ rte_mp_request_sync;
rte_mp_sendmsg;
rte_option_register;
rte_realloc_socket;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section
2019-04-05 20:30 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section Stephen Hemminger
@ 2019-04-05 20:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-06-14 7:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2019-04-05 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger
The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic
order but running sort showed several mistakes.
This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise.
Purely for humans.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map | 36 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
index d6e375135ad1..33f2c303a361 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
@@ -277,6 +277,14 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
rte_class_unregister;
rte_ctrl_thread_create;
rte_delay_us_sleep;
+ rte_devargs_add;
+ rte_devargs_dump;
+ rte_devargs_insert;
+ rte_devargs_next;
+ rte_devargs_parse;
+ rte_devargs_parsef;
+ rte_devargs_remove;
+ rte_devargs_type_count;
rte_dev_dma_map;
rte_dev_dma_unmap;
rte_dev_event_callback_process;
@@ -289,14 +297,6 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
rte_dev_is_probed;
rte_dev_iterator_init;
rte_dev_iterator_next;
- rte_devargs_add;
- rte_devargs_dump;
- rte_devargs_insert;
- rte_devargs_next;
- rte_devargs_parse;
- rte_devargs_parsef;
- rte_devargs_remove;
- rte_devargs_type_count;
rte_eal_cleanup;
rte_extmem_attach;
rte_extmem_detach;
@@ -306,19 +306,19 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
rte_fbarray_destroy;
rte_fbarray_detach;
rte_fbarray_dump_metadata;
- rte_fbarray_find_idx;
rte_fbarray_find_biggest_free;
rte_fbarray_find_biggest_used;
+ rte_fbarray_find_contig_free;
+ rte_fbarray_find_contig_used;
+ rte_fbarray_find_idx;
rte_fbarray_find_next_free;
- rte_fbarray_find_next_used;
rte_fbarray_find_next_n_free;
rte_fbarray_find_next_n_used;
+ rte_fbarray_find_next_used;
rte_fbarray_find_prev_free;
- rte_fbarray_find_prev_used;
rte_fbarray_find_prev_n_free;
rte_fbarray_find_prev_n_used;
- rte_fbarray_find_contig_free;
- rte_fbarray_find_contig_used;
+ rte_fbarray_find_prev_used;
rte_fbarray_find_rev_biggest_free;
rte_fbarray_find_rev_biggest_used;
rte_fbarray_find_rev_contig_free;
@@ -346,24 +346,24 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
rte_mem_event_callback_register;
rte_mem_event_callback_unregister;
rte_mem_iova2virt;
- rte_mem_set_dma_mask;
- rte_mem_virt2memseg;
- rte_mem_virt2memseg_list;
rte_memseg_contig_walk;
rte_memseg_contig_walk_thread_unsafe;
rte_memseg_get_fd;
rte_memseg_get_fd_offset;
- rte_memseg_get_fd_thread_unsafe;
rte_memseg_get_fd_offset_thread_unsafe;
+ rte_memseg_get_fd_thread_unsafe;
rte_memseg_list_walk;
rte_memseg_list_walk_thread_unsafe;
rte_memseg_walk;
rte_memseg_walk_thread_unsafe;
+ rte_mem_set_dma_mask;
+ rte_mem_virt2memseg;
+ rte_mem_virt2memseg_list;
rte_mp_action_register;
rte_mp_action_unregister;
rte_mp_reply;
- rte_mp_request_sync;
rte_mp_request_async;
+ rte_mp_request_sync;
rte_mp_sendmsg;
rte_option_register;
rte_realloc_socket;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section
2019-04-05 20:30 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-05 20:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2019-06-14 7:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-06-14 7:44 ` David Marchand
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-06-14 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: dev
06/04/2019 05:30, Stephen Hemminger:
> The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic
> order but running sort showed several mistakes.
>
> This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise.
> Purely for humans.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
I don't think it's worth adding a layer of git history for this sort.
I would prefer to leave it as is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section
2019-06-14 7:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2019-06-14 7:44 ` David Marchand
2019-06-14 15:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2019-06-14 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, dev
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:39 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> 06/04/2019 05:30, Stephen Hemminger:
> > The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic
> > order but running sort showed several mistakes.
> >
> > This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise.
> > Purely for humans.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>
> I don't think it's worth adding a layer of git history for this sort.
> I would prefer to leave it as is.
>
>
If this is about preferrence, I would prefer we have those symbols sorted
per versions that introduced them ;-).
Much easier to check and see if they are candidates for entering stable ABI.
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section
2019-06-14 7:44 ` David Marchand
@ 2019-06-14 15:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-20 17:23 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2019-06-14 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Marchand, Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, dev
On 6/14/2019 8:44 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:39 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
>> 06/04/2019 05:30, Stephen Hemminger:
>>> The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic
>>> order but running sort showed several mistakes.
>>>
>>> This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise.
>>> Purely for humans.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>>
>> I don't think it's worth adding a layer of git history for this sort.
>> I would prefer to leave it as is.
>>
>>
> If this is about preferrence, I would prefer we have those symbols sorted
> per versions that introduced them ;-).
> Much easier to check and see if they are candidates for entering stable ABI.
>
Not bad idea, +1 from my side J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section
2019-06-14 15:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2019-06-20 17:23 ` David Marchand
2019-07-26 13:54 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2019-06-20 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, dev
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:32 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
> On 6/14/2019 8:44 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:39 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> 06/04/2019 05:30, Stephen Hemminger:
> >>> The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic
> >>> order but running sort showed several mistakes.
> >>>
> >>> This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise.
> >>> Purely for humans.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> >>
> >> I don't think it's worth adding a layer of git history for this sort.
> >> I would prefer to leave it as is.
> >>
> >>
> > If this is about preferrence, I would prefer we have those symbols sorted
> > per versions that introduced them ;-).
> > Much easier to check and see if they are candidates for entering stable
> ABI.
> >
>
> Not bad idea, +1 from my side J
>
Here is what it looks like:
https://github.com/david-marchand/dpdk/commit/cab0d75ea6bdc7782566d7aad6718b9f5fa784f7
Comments?
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section
2019-06-20 17:23 ` David Marchand
@ 2019-07-26 13:54 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2019-07-26 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, dev
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 7:23 PM David Marchand
<david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:32 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/14/2019 8:44 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:39 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> 06/04/2019 05:30, Stephen Hemminger:
>> >>> The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic
>> >>> order but running sort showed several mistakes.
>> >>>
>> >>> This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise.
>> >>> Purely for humans.
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>> >>
>> >> I don't think it's worth adding a layer of git history for this sort.
>> >> I would prefer to leave it as is.
>> >>
>> >>
>> > If this is about preferrence, I would prefer we have those symbols sorted
>> > per versions that introduced them ;-).
>> > Much easier to check and see if they are candidates for entering stable ABI.
>> >
>>
>> Not bad idea, +1 from my side J
>
>
> Here is what it looks like:
> https://github.com/david-marchand/dpdk/commit/cab0d75ea6bdc7782566d7aad6718b9f5fa784f7
Sent the patch rebased on master.
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/57172/
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-26 13:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-05 20:30 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-05 20:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-06-14 7:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-06-14 7:44 ` David Marchand
2019-06-14 15:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-20 17:23 ` David Marchand
2019-07-26 13:54 ` David Marchand
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).