From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDAC58F7 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:30:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id z2so6603840wiv.5 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:30:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=tv7QfA++lEOnPBvcIl08f/Mk2S+RHJdBU3QWrNgk8pA=; b=UD4dFP/+dlTH6ffDw7og8LszU4ZWlDD/1ILAXeWCZ4tJ8ea+7HoGP4aZZ8jgE8nQJj lSx6dP6lXZj09X2vTQ8P1Dup1Fxhtf5pYgyccN4up6NhuFm5BPbTjCdrTeljGRKTYv/g bfQnKFbEd3BDs2a6/6w9yep1t713+w619x1+wbG5suLBiA2k3rA1NyRuQO71eXT/nKsh JZAHxJv7p4RP0m1ZTxIizy2MlqxFxP+hGglGn6ydtoDB4BHr8dZZXZo/6u5+1W7TV4a8 pVPJBs2w4ZaUe5n6ZKR1J28wPEDD8bYHC1t3KfZKvrLLbN9QJ4pxMahMzxFF1l32S3qm s/xg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmUQVkXE4+xKM8olo4R+IUmK3zcUMRvHvpfNzneXse2dDf89pWLS+AV/Wv8dLy9al+k6RoA X-Received: by 10.180.82.137 with SMTP id i9mr10483225wiy.38.1421253037839; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:30:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fp2sm19298559wib.8.2015.01.14.08.30.36 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:30:37 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:30:15 +0100 Message-ID: <2334334.VuS9a0PCxR@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.17.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150109092659.GA11296@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <20150109092659.GA11296@bricha3-MOBL3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Packet Rx issue with DPDK1.8 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:30:38 -0000 2015-01-09 09:26, Bruce Richardson: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 06:45:57AM +0000, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > > > I tried with your suggestion. > > > > When I disable the _vec function with the following config change, the > > usecase works for me. So it points to some issue in the _vec function. > > > > CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR=y, I changed this parameter to > > CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR=n > > > > There appears to be some gottcha in the function therefore, somebody may > > want to run some tests again perhaps with jumbo frames enabled (and > > sending small normal frames) > > > > Regards > > -Prashant > > Yes, we'll perform additional testing and see what we can turn up. Bruce, any news about this bug? It seems important and could justify (with other bugs) to release a version 1.8.1. Thanks -- Thomas