From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2138EA490
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:10:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712B320E05;
 Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:10:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:10:15 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=D8yAn0ahekPocvjd4lEtGJc+Wn
 idR5wzm+UWhp0PK3I=; b=Q/FY8pcP6D9yooj4TndfKrKR9kW4sOR4URQMk+oo9Q
 VP/QDyYJZdW7cCt8kNESF3lsw48H8dKrZrSyDk/bkA5Wr6fZLqZTltOcW4SrRu24
 8gHNmQMxXAie7M8Mw/Az3HZqz1KU92W7VXXLXN66+FM54Bx2PxsOw9gYemDAuZd4
 Y=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=D8yAn0
 ahekPocvjd4lEtGJc+WnidR5wzm+UWhp0PK3I=; b=Y+DDfUhSSpTFUHnxZSzbGK
 vBuRu3DP6Oxg0Y2lvcCaEYvxmcbiitnhYAcpIE7+CEEw8VynIQ8lAH0HBKRQqnpi
 OrHf5va6k7CTbvDaNH9LUvrna95N/9I+t83AGAc0uv3gQJfS9cZbaijFjZrLw4WD
 PftVXES7Wpdf5syOTUMOJwEDQkJWd0ijda0RAIuJ9CM79NSe74ntGg2UbCN/w7Mf
 VV2W7qaEVMWdBNT/wcr1BHnM3pHaRTMsW3w6KJRU+fCuITrWuLuRfY++J1DeN2sr
 zIQ/0p7hpRR+gQPYjegdsdnebR5Im0DOu9lUKkdxOrzXqNNy+9+bgh9Rk8Glz/jQ
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:x8FYWou6R0nxawqxQgV5gW1engEareTEW9McALoHyMy3N4YZpDtO7Q>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 33519247FC;
 Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:10:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:09:45 +0100
Message-ID: <2335338.cbEazGGZus@xps>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0401MB24641D5D4024A9D4AA7F9D0C90170@VI1PR0401MB2464.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20180102130838.3630-1-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <1530347.4gd1k8lWyn@xps>
 <VI1PR0401MB24641D5D4024A9D4AA7F9D0C90170@VI1PR0401MB2464.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/fslmc: add support for scanned device
	count
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:10:16 -0000

12/01/2018 13:59, Shreyansh Jain:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 5:15 PM
> > To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/fslmc: add support for scanned device
> > count
> > 
> > 02/01/2018 14:08, Shreyansh Jain:
> > > FSLMC bus detects a multiple type of logical objects representing
> > > components of the datapath.
> > >
> > > Using the type of device, a newly introduced API
> > > rte_fslmc_get_device_count can return the count of devices
> > > scanned of that device type.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > > :: This patch is based on *net-next* tree.
> > 
> > Why is it based on next-net tree?
> 
> Because there is a dependency of a lot of patches for DPAA2 which were only on net-next when I sent this patch out. (dependency for lines, not for logic). Else, those would have conflicted when you would have merged net-next into master.
> 
> If those have been merged into master, this should be applicable on master as well.

I have delegated the patch to Ferruh.
Thanks