From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3538F2C65 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:56:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n3so37617361wmn.0 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wvBiXmKrPoi0AlwW0YS7XRJBFjis9JSzmWNFyARlhlU=; b=WBpBLF8p2oEBHuwuHT4APq8Mx0i1GOtJE0d32UeWOrp43/CPvDVaLRaJgKoNhOzWGd uy90YVvIpEEjceyrMc/OZ706sOHk9lR98GsgmwF2+UiArX8ImWruYwN0mIcXa//KNJcx 8lho0D8qHl7off1yoiqp4OO1NFSUBh1lXpe4wTT3dkUcCHkuntNdL5Eyd2G0HgZuo4/V 3jV+eES9zkhrjFNRhAHFI23W1w90QrRhv5DP/Mi+1etjKCzu25TH5DV0TTuGpek4Ro2w g8IrB6h40uoZhnJJ0hOM7SAkYqaaEjND8v+cmmuRjll+mzB5HwNqMtjwUul31pLHGF6/ hgdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wvBiXmKrPoi0AlwW0YS7XRJBFjis9JSzmWNFyARlhlU=; b=TqNg0ph01Qxm3NYqrs61KQVKJIkyP6SWDfbCBdANN7UnP5DPhJt8pJvm8JCFL2eMgA URmrkmxgDNXU3nrir8xSvHj++D4mZ7AS1mqNAmV0UHdOkRoM87a8vSJ8w0Z50RZRnaMC 2N2eTdanbAE8Lef3I/F+jZV2sF8m5N+OpBoXa7BohBZ+NfZUs6SZ4tb/5VCJcwZ6BXD0 mlM78/D2FRTAJim3Xb51jXI6VXx1Y0/9C9y+yCpLYtkedcK635669oriE2QYydfsFuHx JiTuBOVlftcyA4IvGzzkdTqDzWDnkBhJjqHiP/LKKLcdZ6vR/xSI2rwgLYHzE3vB40hD k4yQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FV59Z+gIb/zACQKkgIRILKP80z9EYup8Jq3u2sFLrFK5wjDtS1YMRLCg8/9rAxHN8nz X-Received: by 10.194.157.195 with SMTP id wo3mr3951443wjb.155.1461081393049; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o73sm2614359wme.16.2016.04.19.08.56.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:56:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Lazaros Koromilas Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Ananyev, Konstantin" Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:56:29 +0200 Message-ID: <2380816.EghbxR00Rr@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1459784610-14008-1-git-send-email-l@nofutznetworks.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B3F4BA@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] mempool: allow for user-owned mempool caches X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:56:33 -0000 2016-04-19 18:39, Lazaros Koromilas: > >> Removes the API calls: > >> > >> rte_mempool_sp_put_bulk(mp, obj_table, n) > >> rte_mempool_sc_get_bulk(mp, obj_table, n) > >> rte_mempool_sp_put(mp, obj) > >> rte_mempool_sc_get(mp, obj) > > > > Hmm, shouldn't we deprecate it first for a release before removing completely? > > Let say for now you can just make them macros that calls the remaining functions or so. > > How do we mark the calls as deprecated? The librte_compat stuff don't > apply here as we don't have a different version of the same symbol or > something. Do I need to put them as a notice? Yes a notice and add __rte_deprecated.