From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Burdick, Cliff" <Cliff.Burdick@viasat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:21:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2381267.oLnQdW0j6H@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03A7D9A58FAFB54FBB01FEE199D7308A0134B8EE1F@wdc1exchmbxp02.hq.corp.viasat.com>
13/11/2018 00:33, Burdick, Cliff:
> This patch was submitted by Jean Tourrilhes over two years ago, but didn't receive any responses. I hit the same issue recently when trying to use cgo (Golang) as a primary process linked to libdpdk.a against a C++ application linked against the same library.
The question is to know why you don't have the same constructors in primary and seconday?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-12 23:33 Burdick, Cliff
2018-11-13 9:21 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-11-13 9:39 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-13 15:45 ` Burdick, Cliff
2018-11-13 16:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-13 16:38 ` Burdick, Cliff
2018-11-13 16:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-13 22:08 ` Burdick, Cliff
2018-11-13 22:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-13 23:42 ` Burdick, Cliff
2018-11-14 11:47 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-11-14 17:40 ` Burdick, Cliff
2018-11-14 18:15 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-11-14 18:24 ` Burdick, Cliff
2018-11-15 9:33 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-11-15 16:15 ` Burdick, Cliff
2018-11-15 16:41 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-11-15 16:55 ` Burdick, Cliff
2018-11-15 17:01 ` Richardson, Bruce
2018-11-15 17:05 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-11-15 17:17 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-11-15 17:36 ` Burdick, Cliff
2018-11-16 10:22 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-11-15 18:22 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-11-16 10:23 ` Bruce Richardson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-22 20:46 [dpdk-dev] [Bug] Static constructors considered evil Jean Tourrilhes
2016-09-22 21:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs Jean Tourrilhes
2016-10-04 13:11 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-10-04 16:59 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2016-10-05 7:58 ` David Marchand
2016-10-05 16:49 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2016-10-05 17:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-05 17:34 ` Jean Tourrilhes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2381267.oLnQdW0j6H@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=Cliff.Burdick@viasat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).