From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9391B1BD for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 19:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F39920A52; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:12:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 06 Oct 2017 13:12:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=RaIgh+xtZA9FOKt xOlq2yG9Oe1yg5opFCEVneg1+VJ4=; b=ViQJYBYSVLqRuVv+io6nSyOvCrDey1R EfuSm+WLqdBC00tN2JMJsJmL+rldBE0zDtcZtWs3z03Opgp0GCoYrjpF/iEM8Roq /TfP8ADVmSzWepOeccRXPbsF2sbnyaVoqSt9mEo2TbPIdQabetiFH4bcAM5PnB/5 1quaccx+/EGk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=RaIgh+xtZA9FOKtxOlq2yG9Oe1yg5opFCEVneg1+VJ4=; b=bpQnuoG2 vUy4J3BP+VgmmMZmSC5TmTqkj9L1vcJh+H7tdSV4LN8UjqjLUmWDVI6FLEH932ZH uBk2XitTDWK1NbuSZEfI/hRUsrZ3Qr8vBxrVCadtIWLkbPmXbFkvRaMkNrUV4UuF YT+xYnApC91cchK2aX3gvAkWms8eEmg09UKcOPn0+RM01VaTy74a0pGVxhpqNoEZ 3kXWO8mIXhXYURg00TQXMf6J+DP+MfjdsB9/gXr0fh9DaLxObsIb+XigGLA2YWHn h9OF5ZmOS5gy0sNErLUseekuZoofyrw+GB5lnyAgrQ27Ah0xkOjQZBUnKxbuzc0A zbR6otY78XRQKA== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: +buVpN08O0bAEtfe9eQNpJ/8BUnWHP5lLz4BncJkQ6rV 1507309966 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 462A27F92C; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:12:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Luca Boccassi , yliu@fridaylinux.org Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Mcnamara, John" Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 19:12:45 +0200 Message-ID: <2385365.XUACAUbIaV@xps> In-Reply-To: <1507307118.24598.3.camel@debian.org> References: <1507307118.24598.3.camel@debian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 17:12:47 -0000 06/10/2017 18:25, Luca Boccassi: > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:05 +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > Hi, > > > > At the recent DPDK 2017 Userspace in Dublin it was agreed that we > > should have a DPDK 17.11 LTS with 2 year support that would run in > > parallel with the DPDK 16.11 LTS. > > > > However, if order for this to happen the community will have to > > provide a maintainer, either for 17.11 LTS or for 16.11 LTS (to allow > > Yuanhan to move from 16.11 LTS maintenance to 17.11 LTS maintenance). > > > > Ideally this person should come from one of the OSVs. Either way if > > we don't get a volunteer we won't have a 17.11 LTS. > > > > Volunteers please step forward. > > > > John > > Hello John, > > I was just about to write you :-) > > I am available to volunteer. I've just got permission from AT&T > management to dedicate some working hours every week to the project > (this is the reason why I didn't say anything on the spot - I needed to > ask first due to the time requirements). > > I am fine with either 16.11 or 17.11, whichever Yuanhan prefers. > > Thanks! Thanks a lot Luca, and welcome :) You will have to send me a public SSH key. Yuanhan, how do you prefer to split the workload?