From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B777B393 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:05:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r20so8276488wiv.12 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:12:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=c9IG68kzfPZe3U7ViHqq+E6OvICm45M6IacWYSIy6S0=; b=jzm0lhvj4bKlGEelPapffjt9DGbXFlw3VwqYgSWrXEtpvv1hKU+O8M27L7tXC3wtT2 vQ/Apd+uRVMOpWtwZHqxORjsNKL/vQT6vYjqt8ncLyTMMd3p1Zd5GBdubvXZaYi/K3r8 xTxY5odxuMUwnOrhveGoXRGkStNmj6I5chgfDYbYNePBNDvXGs3KhQ94uiy7HCY5XIIj 5nm8fxdZFSy5U6f1tuCFVaP6V3G0MYKUlfX6y7sUwJ+kivB/k9kfY0vQw7bidB1FYpxz oSbmyvWdi+pbTJGS8K1embzb8o3wW1E7GYE8ifsMsu2PJMeFn6addtYWgsksuEdOPb/F hXAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkyWPaDh+MAKyc0R80buF4QpARez/RcHjFMukFUT27j/upW+TgaD6NGhCDJ6IlxrouBSVSS X-Received: by 10.180.92.225 with SMTP id cp1mr17481026wib.5.1411629134118; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm1670217wjy.14.2014.09.25.00.12.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:12:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Fu, JingguoX" Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:12:05 +0200 Message-ID: <2393176.zJD9MqeYnF@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.15.8-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <6BD6202160B55B409D42329311582262548504@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1408006475-17606-1-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com> <6BD6202160B55B409D42329311582262548504@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] virtio: Support mergeable buffer in virtio pmd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 07:05:57 -0000 2014-09-25 00:47, Fu, JingguoX: > Yes, I had finished the patch validation, so I reply the email, thanks. I think there are 3 cases where a test report could be needed: 1) the patch is pending 2) an error is found during validation 3) the test is described with some useful information Here the third case could apply if you were describing how you test "zero copy" and "one copy". > > > This patch tests with user space vhost driver library patch. > > > We verified zero copy and one copy test cases for functional and > > performance. > > > > > > This patch depend on the two patches: > > > [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: Update max RX packet length > > > http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005107.html > > > [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: Fix vring entry number issue > > > http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005170.html Thanks -- Thomas