DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com, yskoh@mellanox.com,
	arybchenko@solarflare.com, bernard.iremonger@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] segment sanity checks
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 02:33:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2396925.LEeXtTcc9E@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546851432-19397-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>

07/01/2019 09:57, David Marchand:
> Resubmitting this series that I did not finish in my previous life (6WIND
> people are okay with this).
> 
> Here is a little series which helped me identify a multi segment issue.
> Hope it can help others.
> 
> The difference since the RFC patches I sent some time ago is that, rather
> than force the user to build the dpdk with CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG
> enabled, it uses rx/tx callbacks to apply checks on the mbufs.
> 
> Changelog since v1:
> - dropped unnecessary casts in patch 1,
> - rewrote patch 3: reused the existing rx/tx callbacks and left the invalid
>   mbufs in rx bulk

Applied, thanks

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-15  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-07  8:57 David Marchand
2019-01-07  8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] mbuf: add sanity checks on segment metadata David Marchand
2019-01-07  8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] mbuf: add a non fatal sanity check helper David Marchand
2019-01-07  8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] app/testpmd: check mbufs in verbose mode David Marchand
2019-01-08  9:53   ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-01-15  1:33 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2396925.LEeXtTcc9E@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).