From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C212E56B7 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:22:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 128so170519509wmz.1 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 07:22:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=p1IR7C61Bvugx/xlLaN/j5YstBklG4YvGrwdX084Jf4=; b=YOBkJFxC+vNhnbWA0wtvzsDoqfsPrbM55B18CkPqBbBEBcbrYAg9LukB325wYJe4fG /JqqOyUKdfHsyhndS41KBTjES1aBkaw8JeM3UHrFd4QN5vJGSexKg7oSaU/YmpPD3MgU Dkie4H4Rzehwb/fVsnQNsmfY/1iKqRbNxIQx83g/86MwJMy/Xzt1P2CPExkPsq4EAjEg a0+kb7hoF24RoaqfNbtuT3oZWzdrlNjmonMqt/F0JzXTYzbdK2B8OSMDgvMsbEP8YnOu 8m98yukXX0SVl/LBqPYP+qQfzG5UTc0WbVzxiZ8TE4w178rKIu5SndmuUhZqeNXGW8Pn 0vjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=p1IR7C61Bvugx/xlLaN/j5YstBklG4YvGrwdX084Jf4=; b=HChJPVtVJBJqkRvIcmWxAa3kcEssd9q8IXuH7aQZ4PspQveqgFTK83Do+NYy9Dc24w HooY/H3U8FAtYWAMzeBxdFBBzdB/sAqoDQ3F3v4kdbk4Hy9jRXFuJ9R5fzVgheqBUJ+c ZmZJm5awz+8PWl0wj5xLCC1+Gxsr+4HDNk46jJnGxv7AITQ2Ovvmcp0Ir2HPlV/9M8WX oJLekAzf7YZc/+BmLeKFF0StmwCIBDYZMkeqDqrb5u0gHLG3upbMYayRBVyjlk+TR0wt LXTLiTy0k3G9mZgrlIng6tNfXQe0eNZUgKXGbOSspZfzp+Ruf9zxm5mK1RkLJgVtd6Tv 6IwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTP4JEM7+mrKs/c1FZnV7oeScA3kBJJfFs0aHAWpN1kT2OIlZ2gLU0V8ahyTrPL/qaE X-Received: by 10.28.150.66 with SMTP id y63mr7956655wmd.17.1454512945170; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 07:22:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w8sm7009471wjx.21.2016.02.03.07.22.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 03 Feb 2016 07:22:24 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Declan Doherty Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:21:12 +0100 Message-ID: <2402415.75bQrkATMT@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <56B219EF.7040105@intel.com> References: <1449249260-15165-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20160203112854.GA13036@bricha3-MOBL3> <56B219EF.7040105@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] bond: handle slaves with fewer queues than bonding device X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:22:26 -0000 2016-02-03 15:17, Declan Doherty: > On 03/02/16 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > Hi Eric, Stephen, Declan, > > > > all patches of the set apart from this one and the next (nos 6 & 7) have no > > comments and have been acked. Is there a resolution on these two patches, so they > > can be acked and merged? > > Hey Bruce, Eric, Stephen, sorry about leaving this patchset hanging > around. Can you apply patches 1-5 & patch 8 in this patch set. I've > reviewed and acked all of those patches and I believe they are good tof > go. I need to give further feedback on patches 6 and 7, as I would like > to avoid bring further rte_ring buffering into the bonded device if > possible and I think this should be possible but I haven't had time to > prototype any alternatives but that shouldn't stop the other patches > being applied. Picking some patches in a series makes tracking confusing. The better solution is to re-send the series with only the desired patches. When re-sending, do not forget to embed the acks from the previous version, thanks.