From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6D81B3FC for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:08:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F46F21D7E; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 04:08:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 04:08:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=bvJqNb0vPKuC1cItGY4mvicA71kI0Tcj45cauYhHg5Q=; b=XPualkqzdW3f oRrpyPPtKsDrLyKZoN0uX9TIqn/JNKkutRpqK46kuavicqOUoKVTrMN7+w5p/KzU mnC18s1qloRhhWltVGbpojZEERybNFoooojYqkSpzc8f9C4Yr89ViuvDutNwzsVt Zr8z7dkvpN+sg+m44bNQRPUQCVD2CuA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=bvJqNb0vPKuC1cItGY4mvicA71kI0Tcj45cauYhHg 5Q=; b=kN+/eTfXYauJdx0E+kRk29NhY1RgWXW7jHEks5SLQbic6ACFBppZNKtmx PoNVl0W5CHDojuvlSSoiBbTKGu1zQRqyrvE96CA+8IF4NKxNMd1euE4zwBty0JBW 8SW2naMNMuFi6Dy053InrLleDIZESTFCR8L3CF1LwzdRey20a2Lq9+kF70T3frtH Ld/02xpkxILHlxOJn/VAXgUnwLri6tG/TvfSH/Wq8h5vMoRfld0TtS1ijJ5ZoJXt H7ItdCO9Y/4/7GOPSMZfH0SoX7RV0m4rA8w6+QkJ+0BjLqvvNa4HAe4iGE/l4xVf I/31BT4EAfV0nnzyGPxg8wnV2ttCQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtkedrudejfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurf hrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttden ucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggf gtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrud ekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdr nhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9DA4A100B9; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 04:08:01 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Anatoly Burakov Cc: dev@dpdk.org, John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , jasvinder.singh@intel.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:08:00 +0100 Message-ID: <2404179.zdsFj4qAU7@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1cf22c82b6ca7561966be674afb8a02add0913b9.1544550999.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] common: add bsf64 function similar to existing bsf32 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 09:08:03 -0000 11/12/2018 18:57, Anatoly Burakov: > Implement a new rte_bsf64 function that is following convention > set by existing rte_bsf32 function. Also, document the change in > release notes. > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov > --- > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_02.rst | 4 +++- > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Could remove here the implementations in eal_memalloc.c and testpmd? You could also update the test in this patch.