From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F4DA052A; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:49:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDB3140DA2; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:49:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92822140EBB for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:49:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D935B580965; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:48:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:48:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= yYEXYPmewXl5Fn9Xvl5IoKNe4xfhWMqYUWm/Kl+xxto=; b=N1foc2GyZURl7eLi Rj6/lMLCtcb985rb+RLC7+zKN/cSil/X2LqZHVKjh18ERTYdz2uRuOYqyU2slhRF uwQtLWmPd3mZW+NfaBnWsNtF4I+n7GK0C8a5VdJxG0qjBw3ImRPBXRqfdsafkccN 0nnOtB62tK+SDBCtPhjZOLkIdN7SN3bteF78Jr+nBb5hya13DyWHTsCJMU2xJ2JN HCAvV8kUpoBqRtdKF/5HUKuCENidF47Lo7MQr9wvyAZcTEJZh6q3k0rI2WeblGl6 LUzb9WV+mjwotv7bgZfFz1OR5KqqT6lCycmIVrUbo8oPNsYGqAni30nLB7NFt7Pv VaX0hg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=yYEXYPmewXl5Fn9Xvl5IoKNe4xfhWMqYUWm/Kl+xx to=; b=ls9cTpTmbi2jo9TFOthYMhoJG/4MfDv3n25BsUDTBWxcIYgLgXL5WaNzv ItE5NenRU8dUHxrOUyPyfpcpacxW6pPud/OniOpyxKIShaTO6LEDT6THOfh6KP1w GEWNarLizVuQCLpXlhJmFADICmw6Ess+rjeWC6B+xeqpDPeUnjL1VHTQDpw57AIG tDF6zX+Nyh5DvZd6pMxeUM9QlGdStvWgGdWtFm9zGEILHacZzyX/jZzfKer6PpXG h/KuBcCF7uUL+6iXoV68N3raoRTubLo7jSro2mgN88VommzruMdqk9peJJAGTuhN 47aE3DFzT4UA5LxStlvswRMSnY/lQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeigdefudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeehteff vdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvd dtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E5D341080063; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:48:56 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: "Rong, Leyi" , David Marchand , "Kadam, Pallavi" , dev@dpdk.org, Ali Alnubani , "Richardson, Bruce" , Tal Shnaiderman , Odi Assli , "Zhang, Qi Z" , "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "Xing, Beilei" , "Menon, Ranjit" , Raslan Darawsheh Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:48:54 +0100 Message-ID: <2421050.iSb15thaZp@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20201215021945.103396-1-leyi.rong@intel.com> <3192552.88XjsRaxPa@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] AVX512 vPMD on i40e X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 26/01/2021 17:39, Ferruh Yigit: > On 1/26/2021 4:22 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 26/01/2021 17:17, Rong, Leyi: > >>>> On 1/20/2021 11:21 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > >>>> > >>>> And for the mingw, I have same result with Ali, I can reproduce with (Fedora > >>> MinGW 9.2.1-6.fc32). > >>>> > >>>> But different from the CI, I am getting the error [1] for all following files: > >>>> rte_random.c > >>>> i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c > >>>> i40e_rxtx_vec_avx512.c > >>>> i40e_rxtx_vec_avx2.c > >>>> rte_ethdev.c > > [...] > >> Send patch https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/87349/ to disable avx512 on windows as the workaround. > >> Pallavi also tested with this patch, and passed the mingw and clang build. Will try to see if has better way to fix. > > > > Ferruh mentioned errors with other files outside of i40e. > > > > The patch globally disables the avx512 for windows cross build, not just for > i40e, so I confirm it fixes the build errors in my environment. > > But disabling avx512 like this is not best option. Some may argue that AVX512 is not the best option ;)