From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <stable@dpdk.org>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kni: fix compile error
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 09:52:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <242997ca-ba66-f923-892a-10f9e105cb20@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b11ce44c-d6f7-c35f-b80b-05bbe2736a37@oktetlabs.ru>
Hi, Andrew ,
在 2022/6/1 0:42, Andrew Rybchenko 写道:
> On 5/21/22 10:06, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>> When kernel version change into 5.18 from 5.17, 'netif_rx_ni' is discard.
>> It is replaced by 'netif_rx' and this API is also supported in the
>> version below 5.18.
>>
>> This patch fixed it.
>>
>> Fixes: d89a58dfe90b ("kni: support chained mbufs")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/linux/kni/kni_net.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/linux/kni/kni_net.c b/kernel/linux/kni/kni_net.c
>> index 29e5b9e21f..e19f03285e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/linux/kni/kni_net.c
>> +++ b/kernel/linux/kni/kni_net.c
>> @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ kni_net_rx_normal(struct kni_dev *kni)
>> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>> /* Call netif interface */
>> - netif_rx_ni(skb);
>> + netif_rx(skb);
>
> I think the approach in [1] is the right one. Any comments?
>
> [1]
> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220525102641.20982-1-jslaby@suse.cz/
>
>
>> /* Update statistics */
>> dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
>> @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ kni_net_set_mac(struct net_device *netdev, void *p)
>> return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>> memcpy(req.mac_addr, addr->sa_data, netdev->addr_len);
>> - memcpy(netdev->dev_addr, addr->sa_data, netdev->addr_len);
>> + memcpy((void *)(netdev->dev_addr), addr->sa_data, netdev->addr_len);
When compile, it will report a warning, because it claims that the
parameter types must be the same.
void *memcpy(void *destin, void *source, unsigned n);
so this is what I am doing.
>
> I don't understand why the change is needed and the patch description
> does not shed any light on it.
>
>> ret = kni_net_process_request(netdev, &req);
>
> .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-01 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-21 7:06 Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-23 8:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-31 16:42 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-01 1:52 ` Min Hu (Connor) [this message]
2022-06-01 8:47 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-01 15:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=242997ca-ba66-f923-892a-10f9e105cb20@huawei.com \
--to=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).