From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01792A0C40; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:13:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7791540689; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:13:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F7C4067A for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:13:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA735805C2; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:13:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Jun 2021 12:13:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= 9gGOwv5qTLNghi9ba9Iih3+7ES+7ZUGohrSkTkdLQLU=; b=hPDlf7IX9QFV1t/i Iku1TTLYeu3Ak76JvwGAOg1rhZU3X9tMEJS+Dwrcs++jGYD1t8PPflYVZaF1QySH emPhlxXe+9pDf3Fd+hx13gIb5zwqZ2kL+fc7y2MhwVu9jW41sLWMSb099kAfRbzZ XkEvNgyIGLA+2BuM9xxGLuTtMUD4Ggo/RYBeZo/PW4LX/7PQdpvAt7DX3DdpUIpw CnujtO1kBxRNg/lBeCz7WfVoqlsMzsraoKiupVd45MK6bFR38i5pNK31gM+1wXQN loJmYQZ991n21NPeB0S2OS6+GbvUN5ofdpLn08VgA3qKQ5/udjQ8PI9NTQFSlSP4 MMtsqw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=9gGOwv5qTLNghi9ba9Iih3+7ES+7ZUGohrSkTkdLQ LU=; b=YGuazciuBVd13v7l3P9nhx22NipAV04X5lFe8GF1gGZDoHHVv7170hciF PgkFaJ2l+8MFwYBxNh7G7360U5cE8x9VdhP9EoVynH6YC+uXPZEfZkzPEzQAoujO 0kEphvps/riDKbse/c18kc3JwtxdKHFCjiSerMnn+fpi1t6dYTkD7XOzhrCu3uLO /3du5Mp83WP8ePS+Oq9cCgWnzS0xY4pHwbCWlTishx+I9MSjuvLzbR7FvIQmx4c9 eUurYjyieb8Co+MQudq6W/dXeI9YbYg8wcrsZFjboDuYkSl2JUpVza2AE1erXrpk cwjbqSeCBEMucYe4/3yJ7UtLp+j7A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfedtledgkeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepiedtuedvlefghfdtudevhfeghfevhffgtddtgeetgeejtedugeei udffvdfhvdeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgrmhgruggrthgvrdhorhhgpdiiohhomhdruh hsnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:13:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Ilya Maximets , Ori Kam , Andrew Rybchenko , Ivan Malov , Eli Britstein , "dev@dpdk.org" , Smadar Fuks , Hyong Youb Kim , Kishore Padmanabha , Ajit Khaparde , Jerin Jacob , John Daley , Ferruh Yigit , olivier.matz@6wind.com, shahafs@nvidia.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, Rony Efraim Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 18:13:51 +0200 Message-ID: <2439442.dE1UY4tsTa@thomas> In-Reply-To: <16072371.opfqJCapsB@thomas> References: <20210601111420.5549-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru> <16072371.opfqJCapsB@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ethdev: clarify flow action PORT ID semantics X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 07/06/2021 18:07, Thomas Monjalon: > 07/06/2021 15:21, Ilya Maximets: > > On 6/7/21 2:08 PM, Ori Kam wrote: > > > From: Andrew Rybchenko > > >> On 6/7/21 11:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > >>> I see emails don't work well to conclude on how to manage representors. > > >>> I propose working in live meetings so we can try to align our views on > > >>> a virtual whiteboard and interactively ask questions. > > >>> Participants in those meetings could work on documenting what is the > > >>> view of a representor as a first step. > > >>> Second step, it should be easier to discuss the API. > > >>> > > >>> If you agree, I will plan a first meeting where we can discuss what is > > >>> a representor in our opinions. > > >>> The meeting time would be 4pm UTC. > > >>> For the day, I would propose this Thursday 10 if it works for > > >>> everybody involved. > > > > Second half of the day (CET) is pretty much booked in my calendar. Tuesday > > or Wednesday might work on this week. Wednesday or Thursday might work on > > next week. > > > > >> OK for me. > > > O.K. for me too. > > OK let's decide with a poll please: > https://framadate.org/PAP3t8ycqx3lEUfe Only 5 people voting. We will be at least 4 tomorrow Wednesday 3pm UTC. Everybody is welcome to join the community meeting: https://zoom.us/j/93391811485 We could try another session on Thursday 4pm UTC if needed. https://zoom.us/j/92425132629 Note: we will use Zoom which offers a whiteboard.