From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (mail-we0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819B5B344 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id t60so5804307wes.23 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 02:31:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=R6snxppVsMrOyESs7roBUONrBq39qAIvEppzQdCBWlY=; b=V2tZcbl+kXlVB2BUG6gqAK7MwWu1HGrVwQO+wQj2v8FUKKXvrZ3RTye5aKK/4rDzFf L3tl0p26IQvxir2HJ3rMQKPS/uIx5T//oVTzyjWiWpA+JvLx/KCMwV2uxxxPdbP3fdNw 4X9JdKI++ePFfg5gxc8VY0bQQqboH1pzFWTzQHead76xiic0x/vFRI934WdRljD40NVR +HzXuz95JUNUvRZ4Aeg8yYZp++gJtEv3CP/6L5sXi6ZAsR/6RyYkLCIlVetPG0NjxAsh vSLpmhAzDAtNtPI2fQuvBZ1hxj+6XMTgPIP0MesLscfBj754LKKrKeOP2ophg/qqzVlM XLRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkhKAGKrKO3OPeUgIMavF0fhfc8FC7bGKOREYiOcuEyEIO5b6tNapiMjAId0BKSwWcmSfw+ X-Received: by 10.180.75.143 with SMTP id c15mr7761852wiw.31.1411551113963; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 02:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm18768627wjy.22.2014.09.24.02.31.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 02:31:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Fu, JingguoX" Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:31:46 +0200 Message-ID: <2446963.gpRyEul7fH@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.15.8-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <6BD6202160B55B409D423293115822625483B6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1408006475-17606-1-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com> <6BD6202160B55B409D423293115822625483B6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] virtio: Support mergeable buffer in virtio pmd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:25:43 -0000 Hi Jingguo, 2014-09-24 09:22, Fu, JingguoX: > Tested-by: Jingguo Fu > > This patch includes 1 files, and has been tested by Intel. > Please see information as the following: > > Host: > Fedora 19 x86_64, Linux Kernel 3.9.0, GCC 4.8.2 Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz > NIC: Intel Niantic 82599, Intel i350, Intel 82580 and Intel 82576 > > Guest: > Fedora 16 x86_64, Linux Kernel 3.4.2, GCC 4.6.3 Qemu emulator 1.4.2 > > This patch tests with user space vhost driver library patch. > We verified zero copy and one copy test cases for functional and performance. > > This patch depend on the two patches: > [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: Update max RX packet length http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005107.html > [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: Fix vring entry number issue http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005170.html This patch and the previous one (Support jumbo frame in user space vhost) were part of release 1.7.1. You already sent an email about this test: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-July/004466.html So I'm not sure it deserves another email today. -- Thomas