From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7633796
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  1 Apr 2015 21:47:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wgdm6 with SMTP id m6so64560390wgd.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=g7J89vC7vMA6x9brF8joO1YSBWBd6Zc9kMABBX6+LMY=;
 b=FozA5jZIa0MAzt/r9vBWWQUIEb/gw8c6TXMb9oaQSjs5tLncTDfH9NEqx1I9lhME0k
 +A+oa0L2H7Ek3yrBQM4b69qlBfXqtopk7EHV/4300FtvBiqlwIfaZ/UO6Z6soMevny9X
 W7EFfswZLd8mU3m0inBihcBEszYvC6cjgks+4rvvoeruR20+XeD+i131cTVdGJ7sRC22
 OjXGUPokb+qDqM1qYGQrackVDDXm8i2LXBoCkbMw4Q0I/SoaAjX8KspgL2p31BTV+SjW
 FRF/79mi35EsJOJ1tJPzW/q6zC519J5nGn8GDdXt4L82xqHi8D9hpJUvuLcrPA9vASjP
 58/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmXH3Y2Ka4Vlbs6AXv+T8AGpPwa3mxkI5yzIp3DhLWAlTRXr/2Jkq+cFBPJXkphvwk4bqwa
X-Received: by 10.194.179.194 with SMTP id di2mr18873495wjc.4.1427917675174;
 Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lb6sm4070479wjb.22.2015.04.01.12.47.53
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:47:12 +0200
Message-ID: <2448344.3u2K6bc5gF@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.4 (Linux/3.18.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.4; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A83F55A@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1423740143-29708-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com>
 <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A83F55A@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:47:55 -0000

> > Klocwork reports array 'src_offset' may use index 16.
> > In function i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit, index j + 1 can reach
> > I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN.
> > This patch fixes this issue to avoid array bound.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>

Fixes: d8b90c4eabe9 ("i40e: take flow director flexible payload configuration")

Applied, thanks