DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksum calculating
@ 2020-05-15 13:08 guohongzhi
  2020-05-15 13:48 ` Morten Brørup
  2020-05-24 15:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: guohongzhi @ 2020-05-15 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev
  Cc: olivier.matz, mb, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu, ferruh.yigit,
	nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin, chenchanghu,
	jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin, guohongzhi1

1.rte_ipv4_cksum will return invalid checksum value like 0xffff.(rfc1624)
2.__rte_raw_cksum should consider Big Endian.
3.checksum 0x0000 is invalid for udp, but valid for tcp.(rfc768)

Signed-off-by: guohongzhi <guohongzhi1@huawei.com>
---
 lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
index 1ceb7b7..4177ea7 100644
--- a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
+++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
@@ -140,7 +140,11 @@ __rte_raw_cksum(const void *buf, size_t len, uint32_t sum)
 
 	/* if length is in odd bytes */
 	if (len == 1)
+#if (RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_BIG_ENDIAN)
+		sum += *((const uint8_t *)u16_buf) << 8;
+#else
 		sum += *((const uint8_t *)u16_buf);
+#endif
 
 	return sum;
 }
@@ -267,7 +271,7 @@ rte_ipv4_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr)
 {
 	uint16_t cksum;
 	cksum = rte_raw_cksum(ipv4_hdr, sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
-	return (cksum == 0xffff) ? cksum : (uint16_t)~cksum;
+	return (uint16_t)~cksum;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -324,8 +328,7 @@ rte_ipv4_phdr_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, uint64_t ol_flags)
  * @param l4_hdr
  *   The pointer to the beginning of the L4 header.
  * @return
- *   The complemented checksum to set in the IP packet
- *   or 0 on error
+ *   The complemented checksum to set in the IP packet.
  */
 static inline uint16_t
 rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
@@ -344,7 +347,8 @@ rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
 
 	cksum = ((cksum & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + (cksum & 0xffff);
 	cksum = (~cksum) & 0xffff;
-	if (cksum == 0)
+	/* 0x0000 is invalid for udp, but valid for tcp. rfc768 */
+	if (cksum == 0 && ipv4_hdr->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_UDP)
 		cksum = 0xffff;
 
 	return (uint16_t)cksum;
@@ -436,7 +440,8 @@ rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
 
 	cksum = ((cksum & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + (cksum & 0xffff);
 	cksum = (~cksum) & 0xffff;
-	if (cksum == 0)
+	/* 0x0000 is invalid for udp, but valid for tcp. rfc768 */
+	if (cksum == 0 && ipv6_hdr->proto == IPPROTO_UDP)
 		cksum = 0xffff;
 
 	return (uint16_t)cksum;
-- 
2.21.0.windows.1



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksum calculating
  2020-05-15 13:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksum calculating guohongzhi
@ 2020-05-15 13:48 ` Morten Brørup
  2020-05-24 15:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2020-05-15 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guohongzhi, dev
  Cc: olivier.matz, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu, ferruh.yigit,
	nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin, chenchanghu,
	jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin

> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of guohongzhi
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 3:09 PM
> 
> 1.rte_ipv4_cksum will return invalid checksum value like
> 0xffff.(rfc1624)
> 2.__rte_raw_cksum should consider Big Endian.
> 3.checksum 0x0000 is invalid for udp, but valid for tcp.(rfc768)
> 
> Signed-off-by: guohongzhi <guohongzhi1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
> index 1ceb7b7..4177ea7 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
> @@ -140,7 +140,11 @@ __rte_raw_cksum(const void *buf, size_t len,
> uint32_t sum)
> 
>  	/* if length is in odd bytes */
>  	if (len == 1)
> +#if (RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_BIG_ENDIAN)
> +		sum += *((const uint8_t *)u16_buf) << 8;
> +#else
>  		sum += *((const uint8_t *)u16_buf);
> +#endif
> 
>  	return sum;
>  }
> @@ -267,7 +271,7 @@ rte_ipv4_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr)
>  {
>  	uint16_t cksum;
>  	cksum = rte_raw_cksum(ipv4_hdr, sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
> -	return (cksum == 0xffff) ? cksum : (uint16_t)~cksum;
> +	return (uint16_t)~cksum;
>  }
> 
>  /**
> @@ -324,8 +328,7 @@ rte_ipv4_phdr_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr
> *ipv4_hdr, uint64_t ol_flags)
>   * @param l4_hdr
>   *   The pointer to the beginning of the L4 header.
>   * @return
> - *   The complemented checksum to set in the IP packet
> - *   or 0 on error
> + *   The complemented checksum to set in the IP packet.
>   */
>  static inline uint16_t
>  rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, const void
> *l4_hdr)
> @@ -344,7 +347,8 @@ rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr
> *ipv4_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
> 
>  	cksum = ((cksum & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + (cksum & 0xffff);
>  	cksum = (~cksum) & 0xffff;
> -	if (cksum == 0)
> +	/* 0x0000 is invalid for udp, but valid for tcp. rfc768 */
> +	if (cksum == 0 && ipv4_hdr->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_UDP)
>  		cksum = 0xffff;
> 
>  	return (uint16_t)cksum;
> @@ -436,7 +440,8 @@ rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv6_hdr
> *ipv6_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
> 
>  	cksum = ((cksum & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + (cksum & 0xffff);
>  	cksum = (~cksum) & 0xffff;
> -	if (cksum == 0)
> +	/* 0x0000 is invalid for udp, but valid for tcp. rfc768 */
> +	if (cksum == 0 && ipv6_hdr->proto == IPPROTO_UDP)
>  		cksum = 0xffff;
> 
>  	return (uint16_t)cksum;
> --
> 2.21.0.windows.1
> 
> 

Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksum calculating
  2020-05-15 13:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksum calculating guohongzhi
  2020-05-15 13:48 ` Morten Brørup
@ 2020-05-24 15:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
  2020-05-24 15:31   ` Morten Brørup
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-05-24 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guohongzhi1
  Cc: dev, olivier.matz, mb, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu,
	ferruh.yigit, nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin,
	chenchanghu, jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin

15/05/2020 15:08, guohongzhi:
> 1.rte_ipv4_cksum will return invalid checksum value like 0xffff.(rfc1624)
> 2.__rte_raw_cksum should consider Big Endian.
> 3.checksum 0x0000 is invalid for udp, but valid for tcp.(rfc768)

Please consider doing 3 patches, thanks.

It was sent late for 20.05, I prefer not taking any risk,
and wait for maintainers approval.
The patches must be reviewed and discussed in 20.08 timeframe.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksum calculating
  2020-05-24 15:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2020-05-24 15:31   ` Morten Brørup
  2020-05-24 15:39     ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2020-05-24 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon, guohongzhi1
  Cc: dev, olivier.matz, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu, ferruh.yigit,
	nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin, chenchanghu,
	jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin

> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 5:12 PM
> 
> 15/05/2020 15:08, guohongzhi:
> > 1.rte_ipv4_cksum will return invalid checksum value like 0xffff.(rfc1624)
> > 2.__rte_raw_cksum should consider Big Endian.
> > 3.checksum 0x0000 is invalid for udp, but valid for tcp.(rfc768)
> 
> Please consider doing 3 patches, thanks.
> 
> It was sent late for 20.05, I prefer not taking any risk,
> and wait for maintainers approval.
> The patches must be reviewed and discussed in 20.08 timeframe.

This patch fixes a bug, which is incompatible with some very popular Broadcom switch silicon, so the patch should be treated as such.

However, I agree that the review responsibility is not Thomas' alone; maintainers should step up if they consider this bugfix critical.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksum calculating
  2020-05-24 15:31   ` Morten Brørup
@ 2020-05-24 15:39     ` Thomas Monjalon
  2020-05-24 16:25       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksumcalculating Morten Brørup
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-05-24 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guohongzhi1, Morten Brørup
  Cc: dev, olivier.matz, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu, ferruh.yigit,
	nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin, chenchanghu,
	jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin

24/05/2020 17:31, Morten Brørup:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 5:12 PM
> > 
> > 15/05/2020 15:08, guohongzhi:
> > > 1.rte_ipv4_cksum will return invalid checksum value like 0xffff.(rfc1624)
> > > 2.__rte_raw_cksum should consider Big Endian.
> > > 3.checksum 0x0000 is invalid for udp, but valid for tcp.(rfc768)
> > 
> > Please consider doing 3 patches, thanks.
> > 
> > It was sent late for 20.05, I prefer not taking any risk,
> > and wait for maintainers approval.
> > The patches must be reviewed and discussed in 20.08 timeframe.
> 
> This patch fixes a bug, which is incompatible with some very popular Broadcom switch silicon, so the patch should be treated as such.
> 
> However, I agree that the review responsibility is not Thomas' alone; maintainers should step up if they consider this bugfix critical.

Unfortunately, the lack of "Signed-off-by" is really blocking the merge.
I am not allowed adding such thing.

Given the bug was already there for a long time,
it is probably not so much critical anyway.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksumcalculating
  2020-05-24 15:39     ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2020-05-24 16:25       ` Morten Brørup
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2020-05-24 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon, guohongzhi1
  Cc: dev, olivier.matz, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu, ferruh.yigit,
	nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin, chenchanghu,
	jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin

> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 5:39 PM
> 
> 24/05/2020 17:31, Morten Brørup:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 5:12 PM
> > >
> > > 15/05/2020 15:08, guohongzhi:
> > > > 1.rte_ipv4_cksum will return invalid checksum value like
> 0xffff.(rfc1624)
> > > > 2.__rte_raw_cksum should consider Big Endian.
> > > > 3.checksum 0x0000 is invalid for udp, but valid for tcp.(rfc768)
> > >
> > > Please consider doing 3 patches, thanks.
> > >
> > > It was sent late for 20.05, I prefer not taking any risk,
> > > and wait for maintainers approval.
> > > The patches must be reviewed and discussed in 20.08 timeframe.
> >
> > This patch fixes a bug, which is incompatible with some very popular
> Broadcom switch silicon, so the patch should be treated as such.
> >
> > However, I agree that the review responsibility is not Thomas' alone;
> maintainers should step up if they consider this bugfix critical.
> 
> Unfortunately, the lack of "Signed-off-by" is really blocking the merge.
> I am not allowed adding such thing.

Agreed. A valid "Signed-off-by" with the contributor's actual name a legal requirement - and cannot be ignored.

> 
> Given the bug was already there for a long time,
> it is probably not so much critical anyway.

Or someone has been debugging a production network for years and months, and finally managed to find the root cause of the problems experienced with the affected Broadcom switching silicon. Speaking from experience, the distance from production networks to network silicon software developers can be extremely long. ;-)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-24 16:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-15 13:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksum calculating guohongzhi
2020-05-15 13:48 ` Morten Brørup
2020-05-24 15:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-24 15:31   ` Morten Brørup
2020-05-24 15:39     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-24 16:25       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for checksumcalculating Morten Brørup

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git