From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD89529D2 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:10:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF8B234B6; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:10:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:10:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=8dpknbaZOoSPSbcrMdirrqidHaoGvB8TzSS/N+el5As=; b=Ob/EkTu8OgLR UaDvJnW1OR1bIeaAjdzasfvfWbFdN3WxfbvCxogRC9uCBxI9KWR4CDPTtp7toNy7 E6Ah60+/LcLOpqLfVNIPT6sHWeMAVFnNvZ1dquQeRMkoRZZC1u6A6pAEgEN7JPsW /BhQxV1Y+Igtg6hHVYBU45il8DK+tSA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=8dpknbaZOoSPSbcrMdirrqidHaoGvB8TzSS/N+el5 As=; b=uo6HDJht0myM7JAPPBPaWsrgPUJdbqmclNRthMZpFlnzSjuj/L6Dxew5E B+Il9ZiCdrZPZFyBi7jaBs2uTNrwLmpthPhiu7GVqSVOt//5AKp/EXMh8ARfUH+9 /8EOWqn2FzeOnu0GC1uiYIUxqGB7kOQT1PfP9/QgfICjf6vGw82+EOegT8Gs41Um NfZB/0Y6mERdrnqy6QYXYFJ3uX5LbK7gSNhpehQWK2SSqWCKYGiLwuPdPaE5q5pD mO5ypAuyT3mv+mhGvuHo193OO0Zl0Le8JrMi8KxcNZgbPr7cfoatZLQ/c/r8wX16 LW/IUaCalXfU9h9vOlBjWdIjl3Dew== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledriedtgdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedt tdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfh gggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceo thhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdroh hrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C1ECFE4802; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:10:32 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit , konstantin.ananyev@intel.com Cc: Ravi Kerur , dpdk-dev , John McNamara Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:10:30 +0100 Message-ID: <2510395.XNuST6rEQr@xps> In-Reply-To: <26db3c19-9321-ebd0-c732-54a05ed15a54@intel.com> References: <1489008729-28784-2-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> <1489179491-9401-1-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> <26db3c19-9321-ebd0-c732-54a05ed15a54@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] examples/l3fwd: merge l3fwd-acl code into l3fwd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:10:35 -0000 23/01/2019 17:32, Ferruh Yigit: > On 3/10/2017 8:58 PM, rkerur at gmail.com (Ravi Kerur) wrote: > > This patchset merges l3fwd-acl and l3fwd code into common directory. > > Adds config file read option to build LPM and EM tables. > > > > Ravi Kerur (3): > > examples/l3fwd: merge l3fwd-acl code into l3fwd > > examples/l3fwd: add config file support for lpm > > examples/l3fwd: add config file support for exact > > Hi Ravi, > > These l3fwd patches are in patchwork for a long time, I am updating the patchset > as rejected, if it is still relevant please send a new version on top of latest > repo. > > Sorry for any inconvenience caused. > > For reference patches: > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21696/ > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21695/ > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21697/ > > doc one: > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/24211/ This work was going in the right direction. Konstantin, as the maintainer of the ACL library, do you think it is worth to keep this example as standalone or merged?