From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-0016ce01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0016ce01.pphosted.com [67.231.156.153]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830F65586 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 02:43:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from pps.filterd (m0085408.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0016ce01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u2I1fqhs027263; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:43:25 -0700 Received: from avcashub1.qlogic.com ([198.186.0.117]) by mx0b-0016ce01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 21mjytad1e-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:43:25 -0700 Received: from AVMB3.qlogic.org ([fe80::689d:1159:4632:e0eb]) by avcashub3.qlogic.org ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:43:24 -0700 From: Rasesh Mody To: "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" , Bruce Richardson CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , Harish Patil , Sony Chacko , Ameen Rahman Thread-Topic: QEDE pmd v2 patches Thread-Index: AdGAtorP+a5+kvEaR2yPYnbH5G2kWw== Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:43:23 +0000 Message-ID: <2552F74A0BCCBE4DBE2AD218C81B2811086C60B6@avmb3.qlogic.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.1.4.10] disclaimer: bypass Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5800 definitions=8107 signatures=670701 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1601100000 definitions=main-1603180022 Subject: [dpdk-dev] QEDE pmd v2 patches X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:43:27 -0000 Hi Thomas, Bruce, We didn't see automated build email for all the patches that we submitted t= o dpdk.org. Is this expected? One of our patch, "[PATCH v2 04/10] qede: Add base driver", doesn't show up= on dpdk patchworks site http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list. I= s there any action needed from our side? We received following messages from dpdk build nonfictions. We did apply th= e patch-set to the latest dpdk tree then and it was applied cleanly. Please= let us know if we need to re-submit the patch-set to take care of it.=20 ------------------------------------------ Test-Label: Intel Niantic on Fedora Test-Status: apply patch error Patchwork ID: 11395-11402 http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/11402/ Submitter: Rasesh Mody Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 05:45:39 -0800 DPDK git baseline: 94b0ad8e0aa556230183f4c4d06b68bfd145dce3 error: patch failed: MAINTAINERS:352 error: MAINTAINERS: patch does not apply DPDK STV team ------------------------------------------ Thanks, -Rasesh