From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59960A0547; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:43:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F10160715; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:43:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295B61606C7 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:43:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618F15C01A9; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:43:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 11:43:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= dFrXm2QytTKn7AjYQb9Yk4zRWp6spn7tgbC6eG0No3Q=; b=GMUcL3Lmmc+aLXbD RTCSmO33m/DO8OeE0fAOnWH0cc8M7yCgYONYK70Ybwihhwso0NbP55BTdyihMaZn GMFX5bKmZGeN66jcj27DnQXP2ColC6ZDYzEh9f6VJjDc54kE2RzJN3omUUQasUrT MWR9FQ0jp8bPNLwW4uYFWCnMvgYrNsHbqkucJwFirJXku6D+AufnkBWVUSqWh1sz d6P4Gtp3Rd1eLyxIjO/t6Z0Ebu4gSZDcdta/dA6uaFXaVhyXFXG44U/oYq6jXCFm aoUqFGDi+RonuxPb1ZCXc3/ZeRgNGYBUBTtb+PPE4gRLZu5s3HkmoepjHmzM+tSX JdwVcA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=dFrXm2QytTKn7AjYQb9Yk4zRWp6spn7tgbC6eG0No 3Q=; b=OUrX3eC5Qg9NSs1NYSv42N6EsMFBprJDfSmykLlGviJhO9XOudTSvzEL2 C6P1NuCund2czDT+390wH8qBV/fM83kCF/shWqoIlwxONyrZ9SNMTeQ63vhUWtyX yxIiHl9mhyT4Qapnvih73oWgQPEPMdTuvScRdewleM/jd8vDS9DaZgb4z30Cdw4f 4aIS3HEZGyLy+E31YLCkidEIeFr/hZtrWTZT6K5opnk9FRl3UOhLy/X1hDDP/4je dF743RL9Kv7GlQoArvwbF+LPE/v4zV5dqpVtE4lL1PMZGNwYAjK+2Khpf47ufl8s U7HkUjjPSaq7S/FGjPtanjJlc7g/A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrheefgdelvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeekteehtdeivefhieegjeelgedufeejheekkeetueevieeuvdevuedt jeevheevteenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8E6EC240062; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:43:05 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Juraj =?utf-8?B?TGlua2XFoQ==?= Cc: "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com" , "Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" , "jerinjacobk@gmail.com" , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:43:03 +0100 Message-ID: <2557094.JohW55DncD@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <1612795441-25473-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] config/arm: fix clang cross part number X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 08/02/2021 15:46, Juraj Linke=C5=A1: > I accidentally submitted this as an RFC patch. Please consider this to be= a regular patch. >=20 > With that said, Thomas, would it be possible to get this into the release? Yes =46or the sake of understanding, is it an issue due to a missing rebase? Or was it a miss in the testing of the patch? > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 3:44 PM > > To: bruce.richardson@intel.com; thomas@monjalon.net; > > Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com; Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com; > > jerinjacobk@gmail.com; ferruh.yigit@intel.com > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > Subject: [RFC PATCH v1] config/arm: fix clang cross part number > >=20 > > Rename the 'default' part number in clang cross-file to fix the followi= ng issue: > > config/arm/meson.build:238:2: ERROR: Problem encountered: Unsupported > > part number default of implementer generic. Please add support for it o= r use the > > generic (-Dmachine=3Dgeneric) build. > >=20 > > Fixes: 3d01d65ba0d3 ("config: add aarch64 clang for Ubuntu 18.04") > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > --- > > config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu1804 | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >=20 > > diff --git a/config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu1804 > > b/config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu1804 > > index 8d8cc50ea4..57095c1304 100644 > > --- a/config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu1804 > > +++ b/config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu1804 > > @@ -15,6 +15,6 @@ endian =3D 'little' > >=20 > > [properties] > > implementer_id =3D 'generic' > > -part_number =3D 'default' > > +part_number =3D 'generic' > > c_args =3D ['-target', 'aarch64-linux-gnu', '--sysroot', '/usr/aarch64= =2Dlinux-gnu'] > > c_link_args =3D ['-target', 'aarch64-linux-gnu', '-fuse-ld=3Dlld', '--g= cc-toolchain=3D/usr'] > > -- > > 2.20.1 >=20 >=20