From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793A2568A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  8 Dec 2015 11:04:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so174462406wmw.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 02:04:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-type; bh=Mifk96QY1c27KQaIHj1a1YnN2PKvcFhommffX38vLTI=;
 b=r6ofNQO0hZFvzA+vA7CsIKOWkMzNhhZYqYLyGEwtFRTjGf0yMy+QJwKdK/x/q0FOZr
 veL3lZ337sbTuhESKs1GaWBSpj87XD4PB9iEEn4ygKjlZF/G37wtK/wtKCd3mXxdYLV+
 zZmjgUJ/Q7xKtfVlK57ggsWa2GMsw716SLM/FMAEu6yXLtqGRVGtDgiRpZnVMXqbZkIC
 wDNi2t3tYJ5bQC1c9IWmfMJdfSZgJEkeLvryuo6YjwdT+kPYHqRstxdw6f1FyAYyaosL
 jAqJgCKopHFwK9ThtV0VJQ7mgvNNxjY+gmOwnRaupR6fZGDJ8qS1D7k1Vh5qVsXV6AHm
 +2fQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=Mifk96QY1c27KQaIHj1a1YnN2PKvcFhommffX38vLTI=;
 b=BS58C0k5URVLmSsklz89Ot8KJVbtoF68KmpUMl/3fkgPMKGKzyrFClgr3vswJukJ7e
 +uP+0wSJwS/PUziO+W/omBH6R7sASqWOpMPvqWyovtWYYa8HAC3aZbbpE+ScZsL7xait
 gbjSSZ5d/wrTOzg866MT546QxWMYpgwbojUCgW9h88cvdHybJp4+loqUcsEwA4t23EpB
 k/+Qmsv/TgTnEdPKgS8c7Nsfc9kQnzQmlNMDIpappZ74ZDrBxLIadD+kFWLJ5P+G9WN+
 iI/blOeie0K8DSYGfy2dO0BMgV7+V8ujzAF5hpnk9sIweZocgI+qWdudEI2R8Pr5BA+O
 Ii7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkzqx+r53mrKtvceEGseOAsn9aUgdPGU0PbA3DWwfCbGU/aWRAvDESoU7Vj9MAc0XMOyVphkEDpZrXOrWnFlJOCBhVS4g==
X-Received: by 10.28.194.133 with SMTP id s127mr2720143wmf.53.1449569069333;
 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 02:04:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h67sm20561553wmf.17.2015.12.08.02.04.28
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 02:04:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:03:16 +0100
Message-ID: <2562409.c2PxG9doT8@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAP4Qi3_UT6s+uA8zyvjXWY4mStkn6e6y5eG9cdHKdP49GEhoig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1448995276-9599-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
 <4116700.gN3RbU5N65@xps13>
 <CAP4Qi3_UT6s+uA8zyvjXWY4mStkn6e6y5eG9cdHKdP49GEhoig@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] eal/acl: enable acl for armv7-a
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:04:29 -0000

2015-12-08 15:56, Jianbo Liu:
> On 8 December 2015 at 10:23, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
> > 2015-12-08 09:50, Jianbo Liu:
> >> On 8 December 2015 at 09:18, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
> >> > 2015-12-03 23:02, Jianbo Liu:
> >> >> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM64),y)
> >> >> +ifneq ($(filter y,$(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM) $(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM64)),)
> >> > [...]
> >> >> +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_ARM
> >> >> +/* NEON intrinsic vqtbl1q_u8() is not supported in ARMv7-A(AArch32) */
> >> >
> >> > I'm convinced there is a good reason why ARMv8 is also called ARCH_ARM64,
> >> > and ARMv7 may be called AArch32 or ARCH_ARM. But I don't know why?
> >> >
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/15/133
> >>
> >> > Is ARCH_ARM32 or ARCH_ARMv7 too simple?
> >> > Is it possible to have a 32-bit ARMv8?
> >> Yes, ARMv8-R/M
> >
> > So what does mean CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM?
> > ARMv7? ARM32?
> > Please consider a renaming.
> 
> I'd rather not renaming becase it can be both ARMv7 and AARCH32, which
> are ISA compatibility.
> If further differentiation is needed, CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARMv7 is added
> in the config, just like Jan Viktorin did.

I don't understand.
You say CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM is for ARMv7 and AARCH32, right?
Both are 32-bit right?
Why not rename it to CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM32?