From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>,
ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, rasland@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add field for device data per process
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 22:44:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <256449070.EJcjglVyyx@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1538047596-23954-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>
+ Cc more people
27/09/2018 13:26, Alejandro Lucero:
> Primary and secondary processes share a per-device private data. With
> current design it is not possible to have data per-device per-process.
> This is required for handling properly the CPP interface inside the NFP
> PMD with multiprocess support.
>
> There is also at least another PMD driver, tap, with similar
> requirements for per-process device data.
Yes, it is required to fix tap PMD for multi-process usage.
I am in favor of accepting this change in 18.11.
[...]
> @@ -539,7 +539,13 @@ struct rte_eth_dev {
> eth_rx_burst_t rx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD receive function. */
> eth_tx_burst_t tx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD transmit function. */
> eth_tx_prep_t tx_pkt_prepare; /**< Pointer to PMD transmit prepare function. */
> - struct rte_eth_dev_data *data; /**< Pointer to device data */
> + /**
> + * Next two fields are per-device data but *data is shared between
All fields in rte_eth_dev are per-device.
> + * primary and secondary processes and *process_private is per-process
> + * private.
> + */
> + struct rte_eth_dev_data *data; /**< Pointer to device data. */
> + void *process_private; /**< Pointer to per-process device data. */
We could explain here that this memory is allocated by the PMD.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-03 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-27 11:26 Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-03 20:44 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-10-04 11:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-05 13:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-05 13:17 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-05 13:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-05 14:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=256449070.EJcjglVyyx@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=alejandro.lucero@netronome.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).