From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.212.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C033590E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:09:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id z2so1954267wiv.12
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=QvRESNLYTMZYMTxdvLNiM8cBnTtE11p349hp2PN1XjQ=;
 b=U29KP3fCeronSA2xRID9EvYONo7i1gejV/fpvAowc7Gadk9FYp0WPTAsj4GCsbCBuJ
 Kca/xGVSeEwsbk4/5lvsDEwQLp/THUQZTTU/LhdP4zHNI91pN+7Q0OVRnq2kQ1Jh4ZWj
 YRfBZS1+3OFQZl1xKd86sB4+M2oLavIxk1IIL4x6NVZjjdPojfAM3ydyEQcme033ABCG
 lLmQ8Zo16NLkVyOPy/8r88fB9LjY9LzKc8RXzNXmyboit+ESCdzZ927R7G0lge4OneLX
 WD4zDIruGo5KltwLOh8Baq73CYU7JHMeX+aMzAiPsMcRbOb0QmvSZfPo+alga7H86Boe
 nefg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlAuuwPc9gEZC8xPArYD3KWP69fTRLbsFnC3pyCpmE4H2LKRQKlevIwHu25jq1rkmn9PUpT
X-Received: by 10.194.88.230 with SMTP id bj6mr21943wjb.85.1398856178278;
 Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id co9sm35669253wjb.22.2014.04.30.04.09.36
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:09:38 +0200
Message-ID: <2579041.G0rVZgHGXT@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.13 (Linux/3.14.1-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20140430105221.GA27151@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
References: <1398818805-18834-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <20140430105221.GA27151@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:09:35 -0000

2014-04-30 06:52, Neil Horman:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:46:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK
> > for RPM-based distributions.
> 
> You should merge these into a single spec file so that you only have to
> build once.  That also cleans up the need to adjust the version information
> in the spec file once, and build packages all get the same versioning.

The 4 spec files are used to build 4 different git trees with their own 
versioning:
	http://dpdk.org/browse
So I think it's saner to keep them in their repository.

-- 
Thomas