DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
	ferruh.yigit@amd.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Coding Style for local variables
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:38:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2579488.yFuDdFVEAc@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <722d00ff8ec9497a92b831cfd13475d5@huawei.com>

10/06/2024 18:31, Konstantin Ananyev:
> Morten said:
> > The coding style guide says:
> > 
> > "Variables should be declared at the start of a block of code rather than in the middle. The exception to this is when the variable is
> > const in which case the declaration must be at the point of first use/assignment. Declaring variable inside a for loop is OK."
> > 
> > Since DPDK switched to C11, variables can be declared where they are used, which reduces the risk of using effectively uninitialized
> > variables. "Effectively uninitialized" means initialized to 0 or NULL where declared, to silence any compiler warnings about the use of
> > uninitialized variables.
> > 
> > Can we please agree to remove the recommendation/requirement to declare variables at the start of a block of code?
> 
> I know that modern C standards allow to define variable in the middle.
> But I am strongly opposed to allow that in DPDK coding style.
> Such practice makes code much harder to read and understand (at least for me).

Yes it is convenient to know that all variables are described
in a known place, just after function parameters.

There is also a consistency concern.

Old contributors like to be in a comfort zone,
	and we don't want to lose old contributors.
New contributors may be refrained by old rules,
	and we would like to get more new contributors.

So that's a tricky decision.



  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-20  0:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-10 15:10 Morten Brørup
2024-06-10 16:11 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-06-10 16:31 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-06-20  0:38   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2024-06-20  7:53     ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-20  8:09       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-06-20  9:02         ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-20 14:45           ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-11 15:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-06-11 15:50   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-17 14:38 ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2579488.yFuDdFVEAc@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).