DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, Alan Dewar <alan.dewar@att.com>,
	jasvinder.singh@intel.com
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	dev@dpdk.org, Alan Dewar <alangordondewar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] sched: add 64-bit counter retrieval API
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:51:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2584526.Ov0XTtHtjM@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOEQf6h+iRvAgQ_QfitMn8rNdeN+rU3Zto1uS+kkaZxw6eF6ew@mail.gmail.com>

Is this old patch still relevant?


25/07/2018 11:02, Alan Dewar:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Sorry about the delay in responding to your comment.
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something but I don't consider 64-bit counter
> rollover to be a problem.
> The DPDK QoS stats are just 32-bits wide and are zeroed when read.  So
> if we read them frequently enough the 32-bit counters won't wrap.
> 
> This new API is just a convenient way to read the 32-bit counters into
> variables that are 64-bit wide which allows Vyatta to have a common
> API slightly above the DPDK.
> 
> I'd hope that at some point in time the DPDK will move to 64-bit
> counters, but there may be technical reasons why this can't happen
> that I'm not aware of (support for 32-bit CPUs??)
> 
> Regards
> Alan
> 
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:51:39 +0100
> > alangordondewar@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> From: Alan Dewar <alan.dewar@att.com>
> >>
> >> Add new APIs to retrieve counters in 64-bit wide fields.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alan Dewar <alan.dewar@att.com>
> >
> > Do you want to consider 64 bit counter roll over on 32 bit platform?
> > The problem is that incrementing an 64 bit value is not atomic on
> > 32 bit cpu. The carry operation can race with reading.
> >
> > The kernel has special case code to do restartable sequence for
> > accessing 64 bit counter on 32 bit CPU. These functions become
> > nop's on 64bit.
> 






  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-24 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-18 14:51 alangordondewar
2018-07-23 12:33 ` Alan Robertson
2018-07-23 16:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-07-25  9:02   ` Alan Dewar
2020-06-24 22:51     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-06-25  8:38       ` Singh, Jasvinder
2020-06-25  9:16         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2584526.Ov0XTtHtjM@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=alan.dewar@att.com \
    --cc=alangordondewar@gmail.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).