From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853032BC3 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:22:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jun 2017 02:22:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,377,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="100766833" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.91]) ([10.237.220.91]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jun 2017 02:22:00 -0700 To: John Miller , dev@dpdk.org Cc: shepard.siegel@atomicrules.com, ed.czeck@atomicrules.com References: <1498134644-14089-1-git-send-email-john.miller@atomicrules.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <258b76a4-dec7-0ccc-e568-581cf5cbc09c@intel.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:21:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1498134644-14089-1-git-send-email-john.miller@atomicrules.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/ark: allow unique user data for each port in extension calls X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:22:03 -0000 On 6/22/2017 1:30 PM, John Miller wrote: > Provide unique user data pointer in the extension calls for > each port. Hi John, Can you please give more details about why this is done. I can see in adapter data user_data pointer kept per port now, but why? What was observed with previous code? If this is to fix something, what we should expect to be fixed? And there is mtu_set implementation, is it related modification? Can be separated to another patch? Thanks, ferruh > > Signed-off-by: John Miller <...>