From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/ipsec: fix test suite setup function
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:34:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258010D904F2F@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1547720125-32101-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iremonger, Bernard
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 10:15 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] test/ipsec: fix test suite setup function
>
> Check for valid crypto_null device before continuing.
> Use valid_dev instead of valid_devs[].
> Call create_crypto_session for one driver only.
>
> Fixes: 05fe65eb66b2 ("test/ipsec: introduce functional test")
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> ---
> test/test/test_ipsec.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/test/test_ipsec.c b/test/test/test_ipsec.c
> index ff1a1c4..a5c1c4b 100644
> --- a/test/test/test_ipsec.c
> +++ b/test/test/test_ipsec.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct ipsec_testsuite_params {
> struct rte_cryptodev_config conf;
> struct rte_cryptodev_qp_conf qp_conf;
>
> - uint8_t valid_devs[RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS];
> + uint8_t valid_dev;
> uint8_t valid_dev_count;
> };
>
> @@ -218,8 +218,9 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
> {
> struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> struct rte_cryptodev_info info;
> - uint32_t nb_devs, dev_id;
> + uint32_t i, nb_devs, dev_id;
> size_t sess_sz;
> + int driver_id;
>
> memset(ts_params, 0, sizeof(*ts_params));
>
> @@ -251,10 +252,24 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
>
> - ts_params->valid_devs[ts_params->valid_dev_count++] = 0;
> + driver_id = rte_cryptodev_driver_id_get(
> + RTE_STR(CRYPTODEV_NAME_NULL_PMD));
I still think that guessing device capabilities by driver name
is not a right approach.
Please use check_device_capabilites() here.
> +
> + /* Find first valid crypto device */
> + for (i = 0; i < nb_devs; i++) {
> + rte_cryptodev_info_get(i, &info);
> + if (info.driver_id == driver_id) {
> + ts_params->valid_dev = i;
> + ts_params->valid_dev_count++;
As you use only one device now, I don't think you need valid_dev_count
any more.
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (ts_params->valid_dev_count < 1)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
>
> /* Set up all the qps on the first of the valid devices found */
> - dev_id = ts_params->valid_devs[0];
> + dev_id = ts_params->valid_dev;
>
> rte_cryptodev_info_get(dev_id, &info);
>
> @@ -353,9 +368,9 @@ ut_setup(void)
> ts_params->conf.socket_id = SOCKET_ID_ANY;
>
> /* Start the device */
> - TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(rte_cryptodev_start(ts_params->valid_devs[0]),
> + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(rte_cryptodev_start(ts_params->valid_dev),
> "Failed to start cryptodev %u",
> - ts_params->valid_devs[0]);
> + ts_params->valid_dev);
>
> return TEST_SUCCESS;
> }
> @@ -399,7 +414,7 @@ ut_teardown(void)
> rte_mempool_avail_count(ts_params->mbuf_pool));
>
> /* Stop the device */
> - rte_cryptodev_stop(ts_params->valid_devs[0]);
> + rte_cryptodev_stop(ts_params->valid_dev);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-17 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-15 11:19 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bernard Iremonger
2019-01-15 11:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-15 12:34 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-01-15 12:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-17 10:04 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-01-17 10:30 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-17 11:12 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-01-17 10:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bernard Iremonger
2019-01-17 10:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2019-01-17 11:20 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-01-17 15:35 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-01-17 16:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Bernard Iremonger
2019-01-17 17:05 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-17 23:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258010D904F2F@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).