* [dpdk-dev] some question about rte_security_ipsec_sa_options
@ 2019-01-28 15:34 Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2019-01-28 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Cc: 'akhil.goyal@nxp.com', 'borisp@mellanox.com',
'aviadye@mellanox.com',
Nicolau, Radu, Doherty, Declan, Kovacevic, Marko
Hi everyone,
For 19.05 we plan to extend librte_ipsec with proper support
of construction/updating inner/outer ipv4/ipv6 fields as described
in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4301#section-5.1.2.
So few questions regarding struct rte_security_ipsec_sa_options fields.
1. dec_ttl - as I can see there is no PMD that supports this option
right now. I wonder are there any plans to add support for it?
If yes, what is expected HW/PMD behavior when TTL reaches zero?
Would the packet will be silently dropped by HW/PMD, or would
some sort of error returned to the user (via mbuf->ol_flags)?
From SW point of view - it probably much easier/cleaner to remove
that option and let upper layer to decrement TTL if needed
(as it is inner IP header only).
2. It seems there is no fields to configure ECN construction/update
settings. Hopefully there would be no generic objections to add
some new field(s) here for ECN?
Thanks
Konstantin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-01-28 15:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-28 15:34 [dpdk-dev] some question about rte_security_ipsec_sa_options Ananyev, Konstantin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).