From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E33A2EDB for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:16:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2042BF1; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:16:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5A4B62 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:16:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Sep 2019 03:16:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,565,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="194133903" Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2019 03:16:34 -0700 Received: from irsmsx112.ger.corp.intel.com (10.108.20.5) by IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:16:33 +0100 Received: from irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.164]) by irsmsx112.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:16:33 +0100 From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" To: "Smoczynski, MarcinX" , "anoobj@marvell.com" , "akhil.goyal@nxp.com" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v5 3/4] examples/ipsec-secgw: add frag TTL cmdline option Thread-Index: AQHVdUvw9/CbQJ3nL0KRTvxmeJq6W6dEBW+Q Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:16:33 +0000 Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258019196D3FC@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20190927091028.19316-1-marcinx.smoczynski@intel.com> <20190927155446.19136-1-marcinx.smoczynski@intel.com> <20190927155446.19136-4-marcinx.smoczynski@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20190927155446.19136-4-marcinx.smoczynski@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZDcyNThhZmQtNzkyNC00ODYzLWEzZTMtMDY0MTliYWU3YTBjIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoic1NjQ2RHZW5DUitQMUcxRzRnOW81aEtEelQ4eTEyd3JHdlNtblloazROUTFrckpzWEZ0dFh6V1RTK2Y0SGJHZSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] examples/ipsec-secgw: add frag TTL cmdline option X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" >=20 > Due to fragment loss on highly saturated links and long fragment > lifetime, ipsec-secgw application quickly runs out of free reassembly > buckets. As a result new fragments are being dropped. >=20 > Introduce --frag-ttl option which allow user to lower default fragment > lifitime which solves problem of saturated reassembly buckets with high > bandwidth fragmented traffic. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Marcin Smoczynski > --- Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev Tested-by: Konstantin Ananyev > 2.17.1