DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	"'Didier Pallard' (didier.pallard@6wind.com)"
	<didier.pallard@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:30:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725808E692BE@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725808E68AFB@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>

To be more specific, I am talking about something like the patch below.
It is just a copy-paste of your fix, but implemented and called from ixgbe_ethdev.c
Konstantin

diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_et
hdev.c
index 7e068c2..5d8744a 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
@@ -561,6 +561,42 @@ ixgbe_dcb_init(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,struct ixgbe_dcb_config
*dcb_config)
        }
 }

+static void
+ixgbe_swfw_lock_reset(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
+{
+       uint16_t mask;
+
+       /* Get bus info */
+       hw->mac.ops.get_bus_info(hw);
+
+       /* Ensure that all locks are released before first NVM or PHY access */
+
+       /*
+        * Phy lock should not fail in this early stage. If this is the case,
+        * it is due to an improper exit of the application.
+        * So force the release of the faulty lock. Release of common lock
+        * is done automatically by swfw_sync function.
+        */
+       mask = IXGBE_GSSR_PHY0_SM << hw->bus.func;
+       if (hw->mac.ops.acquire_swfw_sync(hw, mask) < 0) {
+               DEBUGOUT1("SWFW phy%d lock released", hw->bus.func);
+       }
+       hw->mac.ops.release_swfw_sync(hw, mask);
+
+       /*
+        * Those one are more tricky since they are common to all ports; but
+        * swfw_sync retries last long enough (1s) to be almost sure that if
+        * lock can not be taken it is due to an improper lock of the
+        * semaphore.
+        */
+       mask = IXGBE_GSSR_EEP_SM | IXGBE_GSSR_MAC_CSR_SM | IXGBE_GSSR_SW_MNG_SM;
+       if (hw->mac.ops.acquire_swfw_sync(hw, mask) < 0) {
+               DEBUGOUT("SWFW common locks released");
+       }
+       hw->mac.ops.release_swfw_sync(hw, mask);
+}
+
+
 /*
  * This function is based on code in ixgbe_attach() in ixgbe/ixgbe.c.
  * It returns 0 on success.
@@ -618,6 +654,11 @@ eth_ixgbe_dev_init(__attribute__((unused)) struct eth_driver *eth_drv,
                return -EIO;
        }

+       if (hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_82598EB ||
+                       hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_82599EB ||
+                       hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_X540)
+               ixgbe_swfw_lock_reset(hw);
+
        /* Initialize DCB configuration*/
        memset(dcb_config, 0, sizeof(struct ixgbe_dcb_config));
        ixgbe_dcb_init(hw,dcb_config);


-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev, Konstantin
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 5:52 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization

Hi Thomas,
I am afraid I couldn't send you an url we are using.
We take it from internal Intel ND repository.
Though I think, that latest available to download from Intel ixgbe driver for FreeBSD should have pretty close codebase. 
As a rule of thumb in our internal policy: we take shared code from ND and treat it as read-only (the only exception: ixgbe/ixgbe_osdep.h).
Otherwise it might  become quite messy pretty quickly.
To overcome some problems or shortcomings in ND code people usually use wrappers at the upper layer - that way  was implemented bypass support, loopback support, plus some other fixes (reported number of queues per  VF, etc).
I wonder couldn't your fix also be pushed to the upper layer (in ixgbe_ethdev.c or something)?
Thanks
Konstantin 

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 4:52 PM
To: Ananyev, Konstantin
Cc: Didier Pallard; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization

19/02/2014 13:41, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> Can the patch be reworked to keep changes under librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe 
> directory untouched? Those files are derived directly from the BSD 
> driver baseline, and any changes will make future merges of newer code 
> more challenging. The changes should be limited to files in the 
> librte_pmd_ixgbe directory (and ethdev). Thanks

Please, could you send an url to the BSD driver baseline ?
By the way, git is very good at rebasing such patches.
And if the fix is good, it should be applied on the baseline.
Refusing a fix without alternative is not an option.

--
Thomas
--------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Shannon Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


--------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Shannon Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263
Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-21 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-19 11:59 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/2] e1000: " Didier Pallard
2014-02-19 11:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: " Didier Pallard
2014-02-19 12:41   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-02-19 16:52     ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-02-19 17:51       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-02-21 16:30         ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2014-02-24 14:19           ` didier.pallard
2014-02-24 15:34             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-02-25  0:57             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-02-26 10:52               ` didier.pallard
2014-04-08 13:29                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Didier Pallard
2014-04-08 13:29                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] igb: " Didier Pallard
2014-04-09 15:58                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-04-09 16:39                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-04-09 15:49                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ixgbe: " Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-04-09 16:37                     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725808E692BE@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=didier.pallard@6wind.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).