From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C87F593A for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 14:47:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 May 2014 05:47:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,893,1392192000"; d="scan'208";a="516609753" Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.153]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 May 2014 05:47:42 -0700 Received: from irsmsx106.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.31) by IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:47:41 +0100 Received: from irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.70]) by IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.28]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:47:39 +0100 From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" To: Thomas Monjalon , "Shaw, Jeffrey B" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Venkatesan, Venky" , "nhorman@tuxdriver.com" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 00/17] add TSO support Thread-Index: AQHPdc8XoWzTaNFHzkqBPEPDa5Op0ptOHANg Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 12:47:27 +0000 Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580EFA84CD@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1400507789-18453-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <466924555.DZ26nc55Es@xps13> In-Reply-To: <466924555.DZ26nc55Es@xps13> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/17] add TSO support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 12:47:53 -0000 Hi Thomas, I don't see any big changes in the v2 of that patch. At least both things that I have concerns about, stay unchanged in the v2: 1) merge physaddr and buf_len in a bitfield - I still think we better keep = physaddr as 64bit field (PATCH 5). 2) fix_tcp_phdr_cksum() is inside ixgbe TX function, while I think it shoul= d be moved out of it to the upper layer (PATCH 11). Thanks Konstantin -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 4:02 PM To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Shaw, Jeffrey B; Richardson, Bruce; Venkatesan, Ve= nky; nhorman@tuxdriver.com; stephen@networkplumber.org Cc: Olivier Matz; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] add TSO support There were many comments on the first version of this serie, and there is no comment on this second version. So I understand everyone is OK with it and it can be applied in the git tre= e. I'll wait 1 day more. Feel free to comment or acknowledge. --=20 Thomas