From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "jigsaw@gmail.com" <jigsaw@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/13] mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:00:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213AE5A1@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415984609-2484-7-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Hi Oliver,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 5:03 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: jigsaw@gmail.com
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/13] mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag
>
> In test-pmd (rxonly.c), the code is able to dump the list of ol_flags.
> The issue is that the list of flags in the application has to be
> synchronized with the flags defined in rte_mbuf.h.
>
> This patch introduces 2 new functions rte_get_rx_ol_flag_name()
> and rte_get_tx_ol_flag_name() that returns the name of a flag from
> its mask. It also fixes rxonly.c to use this new functions and to
> display the proper flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/rxonly.c | 36 ++++++++++--------------------------
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c b/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c
> index 9ad1df6..51a530a 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c
> @@ -71,26 +71,6 @@
>
> #include "testpmd.h"
>
> -#define MAX_PKT_RX_FLAGS 13
> -static const char *pkt_rx_flag_names[MAX_PKT_RX_FLAGS] = {
> - "VLAN_PKT",
> - "RSS_HASH",
> - "PKT_RX_FDIR",
> - "IP_CKSUM",
> - "IP_CKSUM_BAD",
> -
> - "IPV4_HDR",
> - "IPV4_HDR_EXT",
> - "IPV6_HDR",
> - "IPV6_HDR_EXT",
> -
> - "IEEE1588_PTP",
> - "IEEE1588_TMST",
> -
> - "TUNNEL_IPV4_HDR",
> - "TUNNEL_IPV6_HDR",
> -};
> -
> static inline void
> print_ether_addr(const char *what, struct ether_addr *eth_addr)
> {
> @@ -214,12 +194,16 @@ pkt_burst_receive(struct fwd_stream *fs)
> printf(" - Receive queue=0x%x", (unsigned) fs->rx_queue);
> printf("\n");
> if (ol_flags != 0) {
> - int rxf;
> -
> - for (rxf = 0; rxf < MAX_PKT_RX_FLAGS; rxf++) {
> - if (ol_flags & (1 << rxf))
> - printf(" PKT_RX_%s\n",
> - pkt_rx_flag_names[rxf]);
> + unsigned rxf;
> + const char *name;
> +
> + for (rxf = 0; rxf < sizeof(mb->ol_flags) * 8; rxf++) {
> + if ((ol_flags & (1ULL << rxf)) == 0)
> + continue;
> + name = rte_get_rx_ol_flag_name(1ULL << rxf);
> + if (name == NULL)
> + continue;
> + printf(" %s\n", name);
> }
> }
> rte_pktmbuf_free(mb);
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> index 52e7574..5cd9137 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> @@ -196,3 +196,48 @@ rte_pktmbuf_dump(FILE *f, const struct rte_mbuf *m, unsigned dump_len)
> nb_segs --;
> }
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * Get the name of a RX offload flag
> + */
> +const char *rte_get_rx_ol_flag_name(uint64_t mask)
> +{
> + switch (mask) {
> + case PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT: return "PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT";
> + case PKT_RX_RSS_HASH: return "PKT_RX_RSS_HASH";
> + case PKT_RX_FDIR: return "PKT_RX_FDIR";
> + case PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD: return "PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD";
> + case PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD: return "PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD";
> + /* case PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD: return "PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD"; */
> + /* case PKT_RX_OVERSIZE: return "PKT_RX_OVERSIZE"; */
> + /* case PKT_RX_HBUF_OVERFLOW: return "PKT_RX_HBUF_OVERFLOW"; */
> + /* case PKT_RX_RECIP_ERR: return "PKT_RX_RECIP_ERR"; */
> + /* case PKT_RX_MAC_ERR: return "PKT_RX_MAC_ERR"; */
Didn't spot it before, wonder why do you need these 5 commented out lines?
In fact, why do we need these flags if they all equal to zero right now?
I know these flags were not introduced by that patch, in fact as I can see it was a temporary measure,
as old ol_flags were just 16 bits long:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-June/003308.html
So wonder should now these flags either get proper values or be removed?
Konstantin
> + case PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR: return "PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR";
> + case PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR_EXT: return "PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR_EXT";
> + case PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR: return "PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR";
> + case PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR_EXT: return "PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR_EXT";
> + case PKT_RX_IEEE1588_PTP: return "PKT_RX_IEEE1588_PTP";
> + case PKT_RX_IEEE1588_TMST: return "PKT_RX_IEEE1588_TMST";
> + case PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV4_HDR: return "PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV4_HDR";
> + case PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV6_HDR: return "PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV6_HDR";
> + default: return NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Get the name of a TX offload flag
> + */
> +const char *rte_get_tx_ol_flag_name(uint64_t mask)
> +{
> + switch (mask) {
> + case PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT: return "PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT";
> + case PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM: return "PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM";
> + case PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM: return "PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM";
> + case PKT_TX_SCTP_CKSUM: return "PKT_TX_SCTP_CKSUM";
> + case PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM: return "PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM";
> + case PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST: return "PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST";
> + case PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM: return "PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM";
> + default: return NULL;
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> index 68fb988..e76617f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,28 @@ extern "C" {
> /* Use final bit of flags to indicate a control mbuf */
> #define CTRL_MBUF_FLAG (1ULL << 63) /**< Mbuf contains control data */
>
> +/**
> + * Get the name of a RX offload flag
> + *
> + * @param mask
> + * The mask describing the flag.
> + * @return
> + * The name of this flag, or NULL if it's not a valid RX flag.
> + */
> +const char *rte_get_rx_ol_flag_name(uint64_t mask);
> +
> +/**
> + * Get the name of a TX offload flag
> + *
> + * @param mask
> + * The mask describing the flag. Usually only one bit must be set.
> + * Several bits can be given if they belong to the same mask.
> + * Ex: PKT_TX_L4_MASK.
> + * @return
> + * The name of this flag, or NULL if it's not a valid TX flag.
> + */
> +const char *rte_get_tx_ol_flag_name(uint64_t mask);
> +
> /* define a set of marker types that can be used to refer to set points in the
> * mbuf */
> typedef void *MARKER[0]; /**< generic marker for a point in a structure */
> --
> 2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-17 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-10 15:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/12] add TSO support Olivier Matz
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/12] igb/ixgbe: fix IP checksum calculation Olivier Matz
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/12] ixgbe: fix remaining pkt_flags variable size to 64 bits Olivier Matz
2014-11-10 16:59 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/12] mbuf: move vxlan_cksum flag definition at the proper place Olivier Matz
2014-11-10 17:09 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/12] mbuf: add help about TX checksum flags Olivier Matz
2014-11-10 17:10 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/12] mbuf: remove too specific PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK definition Olivier Matz
2014-11-10 17:14 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-10 20:59 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/12] mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag Olivier Matz
2014-11-10 17:29 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-10 20:54 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-12 17:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-12 17:44 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/12] mbuf: generic support for TCP segmentation offload Olivier Matz
2014-11-11 3:17 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-12 13:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/12] ixgbe: support " Olivier Matz
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/12] testpmd: fix use of offload flags in testpmd Olivier Matz
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/12] testpmd: rework csum forward engine Olivier Matz
2014-11-11 8:35 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-11 9:55 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/12] testpmd: support TSO in " Olivier Matz
2014-11-10 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/12] testpmd: add a verbose mode " Olivier Matz
2014-11-11 9:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/12] add TSO support Olivier MATZ
2014-11-11 9:48 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/13] " Olivier Matz
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/13] igb/ixgbe: fix IP checksum calculation Olivier Matz
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/13] ixgbe: fix remaining pkt_flags variable size to 64 bits Olivier Matz
2014-11-17 16:47 ` Walukiewicz, Miroslaw
2014-11-17 17:03 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-17 17:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/13] mbuf: move vxlan_cksum flag definition at the proper place Olivier Matz
2014-11-17 22:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-18 14:10 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/13] mbuf: add help about TX checksum flags Olivier Matz
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/13] mbuf: remove too specific PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK definition Olivier Matz
2014-11-17 10:35 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/13] mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag Olivier Matz
2014-11-17 10:39 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-17 12:51 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-17 19:00 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2014-11-18 9:29 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-19 11:06 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-25 10:37 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-25 12:15 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-11-25 12:37 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-25 13:31 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-11-25 13:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-26 0:58 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/13] testpmd: fix use of offload flags in testpmd Olivier Matz
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 08/13] testpmd: rework csum forward engine Olivier Matz
2014-11-17 8:11 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-17 13:00 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/13] mbuf: introduce new checksum API Olivier Matz
2014-11-17 18:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-18 9:10 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/13] mbuf: generic support for TCP segmentation offload Olivier Matz
2014-11-17 23:33 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 11/13] ixgbe: support " Olivier Matz
2014-11-17 18:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-18 9:11 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 12/13] testpmd: support TSO in csum forward engine Olivier Matz
2014-11-14 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 13/13] testpmd: add a verbose mode " Olivier Matz
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/13] add TSO support Olivier Matz
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/13] igb/ixgbe: fix IP checksum calculation Olivier Matz
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/13] ixgbe: fix remaining pkt_flags variable size to 64 bits Olivier Matz
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/13] mbuf: reorder tx ol_flags Olivier Matz
2014-11-25 10:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/13] mbuf: add help about TX checksum flags Olivier Matz
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/13] mbuf: remove too specific PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK definition Olivier Matz
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/13] mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag Olivier Matz
2014-11-25 10:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/13] testpmd: fix use of offload flags in testpmd Olivier Matz
2014-11-25 11:52 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/13] testpmd: rework csum forward engine Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 10:10 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-26 11:14 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-26 12:25 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-26 14:55 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-26 16:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-27 8:34 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-26 13:59 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/13] mbuf: introduce new checksum API Olivier Matz
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/13] mbuf: generic support for TCP segmentation offload Olivier Matz
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 11/13] ixgbe: support " Olivier Matz
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 12/13] testpmd: support TSO in csum forward engine Olivier Matz
2014-11-20 22:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 13/13] testpmd: add a verbose mode " Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/13] add TSO support Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/13] igb/ixgbe: fix IP checksum calculation Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/13] ixgbe: fix remaining pkt_flags variable size to 64 bits Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/13] mbuf: reorder tx ol_flags Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/13] mbuf: add help about TX checksum flags Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/13] mbuf: remove too specific PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK definition Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/13] mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/13] testpmd: fix use of offload flags in testpmd Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/13] testpmd: rework csum forward engine Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 20:02 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-27 8:26 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-27 9:10 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-27 11:02 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-28 8:54 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-28 9:54 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/13] mbuf: introduce new checksum API Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/13] mbuf: generic support for TCP segmentation offload Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 11/13] ixgbe: support " Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 12/13] testpmd: support TSO in csum forward engine Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 21:23 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-26 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 13/13] testpmd: add a verbose mode " Olivier Matz
2014-11-26 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/13] add TSO support Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213AE5A1@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jigsaw@gmail.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).