From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "xuelin.shi@freescale.com" <xuelin.shi@freescale.com>,
"thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: fix ixgbe access endian issue on bigendian arch
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 01:04:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821407D74@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427178825-4172-1-git-send-email-xuelin.shi@freescale.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of xuelin.shi@freescale.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 6:34 AM
> To: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Xuelin Shi
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: fix ixgbe access endian issue on bigendian arch
>
> From: Xuelin Shi <xuelin.shi@freescale.com>
>
> enforce rules of the cpu and ixgbe exchange data.
> 1. cpu use data owned by ixgbe must use rte_le_to_cpu_xx(...)
> 2. cpu fill data to ixgbe must use rte_cpu_to_le_xx(...)
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuelin Shi <xuelin.shi@freescale.com>
> ---
> changes for v2:
> rebased on latest head.
> fix some style issue detected by checkpatch.pl
>
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> index 9da2c7e..961ac08 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)
> int i;
>
> /* check DD bit on threshold descriptor */
> - status = txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].wb.status;
> + status = rte_le_to_cpu_32(txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].wb.status);
> if (! (status & IXGBE_ADVTXD_STAT_DD))
> return 0;
>
> @@ -174,11 +174,14 @@ tx4(volatile union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *txdp, struct rte_mbuf **pkts)
> pkt_len = (*pkts)->data_len;
>
> /* write data to descriptor */
> - txdp->read.buffer_addr = buf_dma_addr;
> + txdp->read.buffer_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(buf_dma_addr);
> +
> txdp->read.cmd_type_len =
> - ((uint32_t)DCMD_DTYP_FLAGS | pkt_len);
> + rte_cpu_to_le_32((uint32_t)DCMD_DTYP_FLAGS | pkt_len);
> +
> txdp->read.olinfo_status =
> - (pkt_len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT);
> + rte_cpu_to_le_32(pkt_len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT);
> +
> rte_prefetch0(&(*pkts)->pool);
> }
> }
> @@ -194,11 +197,14 @@ tx1(volatile union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *txdp, struct rte_mbuf **pkts)
> pkt_len = (*pkts)->data_len;
>
> /* write data to descriptor */
> - txdp->read.buffer_addr = buf_dma_addr;
> + txdp->read.buffer_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(buf_dma_addr);
> +
> txdp->read.cmd_type_len =
> - ((uint32_t)DCMD_DTYP_FLAGS | pkt_len);
> + rte_cpu_to_le_32((uint32_t)DCMD_DTYP_FLAGS | pkt_len);
> +
> txdp->read.olinfo_status =
> - (pkt_len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT);
> + rte_cpu_to_le_32(pkt_len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT);
> +
> rte_prefetch0(&(*pkts)->pool);
> }
>
> @@ -285,7 +291,7 @@ tx_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
> * a divisor of the ring size
> */
> tx_r[txq->tx_next_rs].read.cmd_type_len |=
> - rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_RS);
> + rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_RS);
> txq->tx_next_rs = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1);
>
> txq->tx_tail = 0;
> @@ -304,7 +310,7 @@ tx_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
> */
> if (txq->tx_tail > txq->tx_next_rs) {
> tx_r[txq->tx_next_rs].read.cmd_type_len |=
> - rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_RS);
> + rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_RS);
> txq->tx_next_rs = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_next_rs +
> txq->tx_rs_thresh);
> if (txq->tx_next_rs >= txq->nb_tx_desc)
> @@ -505,6 +511,7 @@ ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)
> uint16_t nb_tx_desc = txq->nb_tx_desc;
> uint16_t desc_to_clean_to;
> uint16_t nb_tx_to_clean;
> + uint32_t stat;
>
> /* Determine the last descriptor needing to be cleaned */
> desc_to_clean_to = (uint16_t)(last_desc_cleaned + txq->tx_rs_thresh);
> @@ -513,7 +520,9 @@ ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)
>
> /* Check to make sure the last descriptor to clean is done */
> desc_to_clean_to = sw_ring[desc_to_clean_to].last_id;
> - if (! (txr[desc_to_clean_to].wb.status & IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD))
> +
> + stat = rte_le_to_cpu_32(txr[desc_to_clean_to].wb.status);
> + if (!(stat & IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD))
> {
> PMD_TX_FREE_LOG(DEBUG,
> "TX descriptor %4u is not done"
> @@ -544,7 +553,7 @@ ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)
> * up to the last descriptor with the RS bit set
> * are done. Only reset the threshold descriptor.
> */
> - txr[desc_to_clean_to].wb.status = 0;
> + txr[desc_to_clean_to].wb.status = rte_cpu_to_le_32(0);
Don't think you need swap bytes here.
>
> /* Update the txq to reflect the last descriptor that was cleaned */
> txq->last_desc_cleaned = desc_to_clean_to;
> @@ -801,12 +810,14 @@ ixgbe_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
> */
> slen = m_seg->data_len;
> buf_dma_addr = RTE_MBUF_DATA_DMA_ADDR(m_seg);
> +
> txd->read.buffer_addr =
> - rte_cpu_to_le_64(buf_dma_addr);
> + rte_cpu_to_le_64(buf_dma_addr);
> txd->read.cmd_type_len =
> - rte_cpu_to_le_32(cmd_type_len | slen);
> + rte_cpu_to_le_32(cmd_type_len | slen);
> txd->read.olinfo_status =
> - rte_cpu_to_le_32(olinfo_status);
> + rte_cpu_to_le_32(olinfo_status);
> +
> txe->last_id = tx_last;
> tx_id = txe->next_id;
> txe = txn;
> @@ -946,14 +957,16 @@ ixgbe_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
> uint64_t pkt_flags;
> int s[LOOK_AHEAD], nb_dd;
> int i, j, nb_rx = 0;
> + uint32_t stat;
>
>
> /* get references to current descriptor and S/W ring entry */
> rxdp = &rxq->rx_ring[rxq->rx_tail];
> rxep = &rxq->sw_ring[rxq->rx_tail];
>
> + stat = rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error);
> /* check to make sure there is at least 1 packet to receive */
> - if (! (rxdp->wb.upper.status_error & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD))
> + if (!(stat & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD))
> return 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -965,7 +978,7 @@ ixgbe_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
> {
> /* Read desc statuses backwards to avoid race condition */
> for (j = LOOK_AHEAD-1; j >= 0; --j)
> - s[j] = rxdp[j].wb.upper.status_error;
> + s[j] = rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp[j].wb.upper.status_error);
>
> /* Compute how many status bits were set */
> nb_dd = 0;
> @@ -976,28 +989,36 @@ ixgbe_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
>
> /* Translate descriptor info to mbuf format */
> for (j = 0; j < nb_dd; ++j) {
> + uint16_t tmp16;
> + uint32_t tmp32;
> +
> mb = rxep[j].mbuf;
> - pkt_len = (uint16_t)(rxdp[j].wb.upper.length - rxq->crc_len);
> + tmp16 = rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxdp[j].wb.upper.length);
> + pkt_len = tmp16 - rxq->crc_len;
Here and in other places, wonder why do you introduce temporary variables?
Why not just:
pkt_len = rte_le_to_cpu_16( (rxdp[j].wb.upper.length) - rxq->crc_len;
?
> mb->data_len = pkt_len;
> mb->pkt_len = pkt_len;
> - mb->vlan_tci = rxdp[j].wb.upper.vlan;
> mb->vlan_tci = rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxdp[j].wb.upper.vlan);
>
> /* convert descriptor fields to rte mbuf flags */
> - pkt_flags = rx_desc_hlen_type_rss_to_pkt_flags(
> + tmp32 = rte_le_to_cpu_32(
> rxdp[j].wb.lower.lo_dword.data);
Same here, why just not:
pkt_flags = rx_desc_hlen_type_rss_to_pkt_flags(rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp[j].wb.lower.lo_dword.data));
?
> + pkt_flags = rx_desc_hlen_type_rss_to_pkt_flags(tmp32);
> +
> /* reuse status field from scan list */
> pkt_flags |= rx_desc_status_to_pkt_flags(s[j]);
> pkt_flags |= rx_desc_error_to_pkt_flags(s[j]);
> mb->ol_flags = pkt_flags;
>
> if (likely(pkt_flags & PKT_RX_RSS_HASH))
> - mb->hash.rss = rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.rss;
> + mb->hash.rss = rte_le_to_cpu_32(
> + rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.rss);
> else if (pkt_flags & PKT_RX_FDIR) {
> - mb->hash.fdir.hash =
> - (uint16_t)((rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.csum)
> - & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK);
> - mb->hash.fdir.id = rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.ip_id;
> + tmp16 = rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.csum;
> + mb->hash.fdir.hash = rte_le_to_cpu_16(
> + tmp16 & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK);
Shouldn't it be:
rte_le_to_cpu_16(tmp16) & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK;
?
> +
> + tmp16 = rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.ip_id;
> + mb->hash.fdir.id = rte_le_to_cpu_16(tmp16);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1051,8 +1072,8 @@ ixgbe_rx_alloc_bufs(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
>
> /* populate the descriptors */
> dma_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(RTE_MBUF_DATA_DMA_ADDR_DEFAULT(mb));
> - rxdp[i].read.hdr_addr = dma_addr;
> - rxdp[i].read.pkt_addr = dma_addr;
> + rxdp[i].read.hdr_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(dma_addr);
> + rxdp[i].read.pkt_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(dma_addr);
No need these 2 swaps here.
dma_addr already converted to LE, just a line above.
> }
>
> /* update tail pointer */
> @@ -1220,8 +1241,8 @@ ixgbe_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> * using invalid descriptor fields when read from rxd.
> */
> rxdp = &rx_ring[rx_id];
> - staterr = rxdp->wb.upper.status_error;
> - if (! (staterr & rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD)))
> + staterr = rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error);
> + if (!(staterr & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD))
Why do you need that change here?
Original code seems also ok to me.
> break;
> rxd = *rxdp;
>
> @@ -1325,12 +1346,17 @@ ixgbe_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> rxm->ol_flags = pkt_flags;
>
> if (likely(pkt_flags & PKT_RX_RSS_HASH))
> - rxm->hash.rss = rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.rss;
> + rxm->hash.rss = rte_le_to_cpu_32(
> + rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.rss);
> else if (pkt_flags & PKT_RX_FDIR) {
> - rxm->hash.fdir.hash =
> - (uint16_t)((rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.csum)
> - & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK);
> - rxm->hash.fdir.id = rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.ip_id;
> + uint16_t tmp16;
> +
> + tmp16 = rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.csum;
> + rxm->hash.fdir.hash = rte_le_to_cpu_16(
> + tmp16 & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK);
Same thing here, seems should be: rte_le_to_cpu_16(tmp16) & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK;
> +
> + rxm->hash.fdir.id = rte_le_to_cpu_16(
> + rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.ip_id);
> }
> /*
> * Store the mbuf address into the next entry of the array
> @@ -1412,8 +1438,8 @@ ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> * using invalid descriptor fields when read from rxd.
> */
> rxdp = &rx_ring[rx_id];
> - staterr = rxdp->wb.upper.status_error;
> - if (! (staterr & rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD)))
> + staterr = rte_cpu_to_le_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error);
> + if (!(staterr & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD))
Again, seems unnecessary.
> break;
> rxd = *rxdp;
>
> @@ -1742,7 +1768,7 @@ ixgbe_reset_tx_queue(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)
> prev = (uint16_t) (txq->nb_tx_desc - 1);
> for (i = 0; i < txq->nb_tx_desc; i++) {
> volatile union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *txd = &txq->tx_ring[i];
> - txd->wb.status = IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD;
> + txd->wb.status = rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD);
> txe[i].mbuf = NULL;
> txe[i].last_id = i;
> txe[prev].next_id = i;
> @@ -2293,7 +2319,8 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_count(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t rx_queue_id)
> rxdp = &(rxq->rx_ring[rxq->rx_tail]);
>
> while ((desc < rxq->nb_rx_desc) &&
> - (rxdp->wb.upper.status_error & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD)) {
> + (rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error) &
> + IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD)) {
> desc += IXGBE_RXQ_SCAN_INTERVAL;
> rxdp += IXGBE_RXQ_SCAN_INTERVAL;
> if (rxq->rx_tail + desc >= rxq->nb_rx_desc)
> @@ -2318,7 +2345,8 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_descriptor_done(void *rx_queue, uint16_t offset)
> desc -= rxq->nb_rx_desc;
>
> rxdp = &rxq->rx_ring[desc];
> - return !!(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD);
> + return !!(rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error) &
> + IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD);
> }
>
> void
> --
> 1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-27 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-24 6:33 xuelin.shi
2015-03-27 1:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2015-03-27 7:59 ` Xuelin Shi
2015-03-27 11:37 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821407D74@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=xuelin.shi@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).