DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:20:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821420FA7@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A8531C4@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Argh, yep my bad -  somehow missed that ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h was modified.
Yep, I suppose it has to be fixed asap.
Vlad, can you provide a patch and move it into struct ixgbe_adapter, as was suggested?
Thanks
Konstantin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Helin
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:28 AM
> To: Vlad Zolotarov; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD
> 
> Vlad
> 
> OK. Thanks! We will try to see if a follow up patch set can be submitted soon.
> 
> Regards,
> Helin
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz@cloudius-systems.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:19 PM
> > To: Zhang, Helin; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD
> >
> >
> >
> > On 04/22/15 08:28, Zhang, Helin wrote:
> > > Vlad, how about the new elements added? E.g. rx_vec_allowed was added in
> > struct ixgbe_hw in ixgbe_type.h.
> >
> > If memory (and sight) serves me well this wasn't in this series... I suggest we
> > move to the relevant thread ("bug fixes in the ixgbe PF PMD Rx flow").
> > In any case, both this and that series were already committed: this to
> > 2.1 tree and the one with the issue u r referring - to 2.0. U are welcome to post
> > a follow up series.
> >
> > Moving them say to ixgbe_adapter would address the issue I guess. It would be
> > nice if u could CC me when u send the series.
> >
> > thanks,
> > vlad
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Helin
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz@cloudius-systems.com]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12:59 PM
> > >> To: Zhang, Helin; dev@dpdk.org
> > >> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 04/22/15 04:23, Zhang, Helin wrote:
> > >>> Hi Vlad
> > >>>
> > >>> I have a concern about the code changes you added in ixgbe_type.h.
> > >> Helin, v9 of this series has addressed exactly this "issue" all new
> > >> macros have been moved to ixgbe_ethdev.h.
> > >>
> > >>> For ixgbe, all source files in librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe, except
> > >>> ixgbe_osdep.h
> > >> were called as "base driver", which was not developed by DPDK
> > >> developers, and released by the other team. We never modify any code
> > >> in those base driver source files, and just copy those file into DPDK project.
> > >>> We did everything in DPDK developed source files. As we depends on
> > >>> that
> > >> team to update future base driver for us, and we don't want to
> > >> maintain any code changes in "base driver". So we need to think to
> > >> move your code changes in ixgbe_type.h to other DPDK developed source
> > files.
> > >>> Though your code changes is good enough, but we may need to comply
> > >>> with
> > >> what we did before. This will save our maintaining efforts in the
> > >> future. Also we have similar rules for e1000, i40e, fm10k. Thank you very
> > much!
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Helin
> > >>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vlad Zolotarov
> > >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:52 AM
> > >>>> To: dev@dpdk.org
> > >>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This series adds the missing flow for enabling the LRO in the
> > >>>> ethdev and adds a support for this feature in the ixgbe PMD. There
> > >>>> is a big hope that this initiative is going to be picked up by some
> > >>>> Intel developer that would add the LRO support to other Intel PMDs.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The series starts with some cleanup work in the code the final
> > >>>> patch (the actual adding of the LRO support) is going to
> > touch/use/change.
> > >>>> There are still quite a few issues in the ixgbe PMD code left but
> > >>>> they have to be a matter of a different series and I've left a few "TODO"
> > >>>> remarks in the code.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The LRO ("RSC" in Intel's context) PMD completion handling code
> > >>>> follows the same design as the corresponding Linux and FreeBSD
> > >>>> implementation: pass the aggregation's cluster HEAD buffer to the
> > >>>> NEXTP entry of the software ring till EOP is met.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> HW configuration follows the corresponding specs: this feature is
> > >>>> supported only by x540 and
> > >>>> 82599 PF devices.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The feature has been tested with seastar TCP stack with the
> > >>>> following configuration on Tx side:
> > >>>>      - MTU: 400B
> > >>>>      - 100 concurrent TCP connections.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The results were:
> > >>>>      - Without LRO: total throughput: 0.12Gbps, coefficient of variance:
> > >> 1.41%
> > >>>>      - With LRO:    total throughput: 8.21Gbps, coefficient of
> > variance:
> > >> 0.59%
> > >>>> This is an almost factor 80 improvement.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> New in v8:
> > >>>>      - Fixed the structs naming: igb_xxx -> ixgbe_xxx (some
> > >>>> leftovers in
> > >> PATCH2).
> > >>>>      - Took the RSC configuration code from ixgbe_dev_rx_init()
> > >>>> into a
> > >> separate
> > >>>>        function - ixgbe_set_rsc().
> > >>>>      - Added some missing macros for HW configuration.
> > >>>>      - Styling adjustments:
> > >>>>         - Functions names.
> > >>>>         - Functions descriptions.
> > >>>>      - Reworked the ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster() code to make it more
> > >> readable.
> > >>>>      - Kill the HEADER_SPLIT flow in ixgbe_set_rsc() since it's not
> > >>>> supported
> > >> by
> > >>>>        ixgbe PMD.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> New in v7:
> > >>>>      - Free not-yet-completed RSC aggregations in rte_eth_dev_stop()
> > flow.
> > >>>>      - Fixed rx_bulk_alloc_allowed and rx_vec_allowed initialization:
> > >>>>         - Don't set them to FALSE in rte_eth_dev_stop() flow - the
> > following
> > >>>>           rte_eth_dev_start() will need them.
> > >>>>         - Reset them to TRUE in rte_eth_dev_configure() and not in
> > >>>> a
> > >>>> probe() flow.
> > >>>>           This will ensure the proper behaviour if port is re-configured.
> > >>>>      - Reset the sw_ring[].mbuf entry in a bulk allocation case.
> > >>>>        This is needed for ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs().
> > >>>>      - _recv_pkts_lro(): added the missing memory barrier before
> > >>>> RDT update in a
> > >>>>        non-bulk allocation case.
> > >>>>      - Don't allow RSC when device is configured in an SR-IOV mode.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> New in v6:
> > >>>>      - Fix of the typo in the "bug fixes" series that broke the
> > >>>> compilation caused a
> > >>>>        minor change in this follow-up series.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> New in v5:
> > >>>>      - Split the series into "bug fixes" and "all the rest" so that
> > >>>> the former could be
> > >>>>        integrated into a 2.0 release.
> > >>>>      - Put the RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT definition at the
> > >>>> beginning of rte_ethdev.h.
> > >>>>      - Removed the "TODO: Remove me" comment near
> > >>>> RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> New in v4:
> > >>>>      - Remove CONFIG_RTE_ETHDEV_LRO_SUPPORT from
> > >>>> config/common_linuxapp.
> > >>>>      - Define RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT in rte_ethdev.h.
> > >>>>      - As a result of "ixgbe: check rxd number to avoid mbuf leak"
> > >>>> (352078e8e) Vector Rx
> > >>>>        had to get the same treatment as Rx Bulk Alloc (see PATCH4
> > >>>> for more details).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> New in v3:
> > >>>>      - ixgbe_rx_alloc_bufs(): Always reset refcnt of the buffers to 1.
> > >>>> Otherwise
> > >>>> rte_pktmbuf_free()
> > >>>>        won't free them.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> New in v2:
> > >>>>      - Removed rte_eth_dev_data.lro_bulk_alloc and added
> > >>>> ixgbe_hw.rx_bulk_alloc_allowed
> > >>>>        instead.
> > >>>>      - Unified the rx_pkt_bulk callback setting (a separate new patch).
> > >>>>      - Fixed a few styling and spelling issues.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Vlad Zolotarov (3):
> > >>>>     ixgbe: Cleanups
> > >>>>     ixgbe: Code refactoring
> > >>>>     ixgbe: Add LRO support
> > >>>>
> > >>>>    lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h           |   9 +-
> > >>>>    lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h                 |   3 +
> > >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h |   6 +
> > >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c     |  11 +
> > >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h     |   5 +
> > >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c       | 766
> > >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h       |   6 +
> > >>>>    7 files changed, 737 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> 2.1.0

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-23  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-18 17:52 Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-18 17:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] ixgbe: Cleanups Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-18 17:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] ixgbe: Code refactoring Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-18 17:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ixgbe: Add LRO support Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-30 14:18   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-30 15:37     ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-30 15:57       ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-29  8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-22  1:23 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-04-22  1:45   ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-22  2:01     ` Zhang, Helin
2015-04-22  2:22       ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-22  2:23       ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-22  4:58   ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-22  5:28     ` Zhang, Helin
2015-04-22  9:19       ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-23  0:28         ` Zhang, Helin
2015-04-23  9:20           ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2015-04-23 11:01             ` Vladislav Zolotarov
     [not found]               ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772582142100A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
2015-04-23 11:16                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821420FA7@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=vladz@cloudius-systems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).