From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40799C42C for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:23:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2015 04:23:54 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,538,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="612094786" Received: from irsmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.23]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2015 04:23:54 -0700 Received: from irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.223]) by IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.130]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:23:52 +0100 From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: remove RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC option Thread-Index: AQHQxVRVRfRkiDhCv0ixKQH+cG+/rp3qe3sg Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:23:51 +0000 Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836A6726E@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1437661781-26808-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1437661781-26808-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: remove RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC option X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:23:55 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Pablo de Lara > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 3:30 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: remove RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_= ALLOC option >=20 > RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC config option is not really > necessary, as bulk alloc rx function can be used anyway, as long as the > necessary conditions are satisfied, which are checked already > in the library. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara > --- Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev > -- > 2.4.2