From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] examples/l3fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l3fwd
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 13:34:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836ADDED8@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451352032-105576-4-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Zhihong
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 1:21 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; stephen@networkplumber.org; Qiu, Michael; Wang, Zhihong
> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] examples/l3fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l3fwd
>
> Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l3fwd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu@intel.com>
> ---
> examples/l3fwd/main.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/main.c b/examples/l3fwd/main.c
> index 5b0c2dd..c766cf5 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/main.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/main.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
> #include <stdarg.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <getopt.h>
> +#include <signal.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
>
> #include <rte_common.h>
> #include <rte_vect.h>
> @@ -75,6 +78,10 @@
> #include <cmdline_parse.h>
> #include <cmdline_parse_etheraddr.h>
>
> +static volatile bool port_started;
> +static volatile bool force_quit;
> +static volatile int signo_quit;
> +
> #define APP_LOOKUP_EXACT_MATCH 0
> #define APP_LOOKUP_LPM 1
> #define DO_RFC_1812_CHECKS
> @@ -1553,8 +1560,7 @@ main_loop(__attribute__((unused)) void *dummy)
> portid, queueid);
> }
>
> - while (1) {
> -
> + while (!force_quit) {
> cur_tsc = rte_rdtsc();
>
> /*
> @@ -2516,8 +2522,12 @@ check_all_ports_link_status(uint8_t port_num, uint32_t port_mask)
> printf("\nChecking link status");
> fflush(stdout);
> for (count = 0; count <= MAX_CHECK_TIME; count++) {
> + if (force_quit)
> + return;
> all_ports_up = 1;
> for (portid = 0; portid < port_num; portid++) {
> + if (force_quit)
> + return;
> if ((port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0)
> continue;
> memset(&link, 0, sizeof(link));
> @@ -2559,6 +2569,76 @@ check_all_ports_link_status(uint8_t port_num, uint32_t port_mask)
> }
> }
>
> +static uint8_t
> +start_ports(void)
> +{
> + unsigned portid, nb_ports, avail_ports;
> + int ret;
> +
> + nb_ports = rte_eth_dev_count();
> + avail_ports = 0;
> + for (portid = 0; portid < nb_ports; portid++) {
> + if ((enabled_port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0)
> + continue;
> + avail_ports++;
> + port_started = true;
Why do you need it at each iteration?
> + printf("Starting port %d...", portid);
> + ret = rte_eth_dev_start(portid);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> + "rte_eth_dev_start: err=%d, port=%d\n",
> + ret, portid);
> + /*
> + * If enabled, put device in promiscuous mode.
> + * This allows IO forwarding mode to forward packets
> + * to itself through 2 cross-connected ports of the
> + * target machine.
> + */
> + if (promiscuous_on)
> + rte_eth_promiscuous_enable(portid);
> + printf(" Done\n");
> + }
> +
> + return avail_ports;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +stop_ports(void)
> +{
> + unsigned portid, nb_ports;
> +
> + nb_ports = rte_eth_dev_count();
> + for (portid = 0; portid < nb_ports; portid++) {
> + if ((enabled_port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0)
> + continue;
> + printf("Stopping port %d...", portid);
> + rte_eth_dev_stop(portid);
> + rte_eth_dev_close(portid);
> + printf(" Done\n");
> + }
> + port_started = false;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +signal_handler(int signum)
> +{
> + if (signum == SIGINT || signum == SIGTERM) {
> + printf("\nSignal %d received, preparing to exit...\n",
> + signum);
> + if (port_started) {
> + printf("Ports started already...\n");
> + signo_quit = signum;
> + force_quit = true;
> + } else {
Hmm, and what if signal_handler() would be executed not in the context of master lcore?
Then there could be a raise condition, and you could end up here, while master lcore
would be in the middle of start_ports()->rte_eth_dev_start().
Probably not a big deal, but why do you need this if (port_started) {...} else {...} at all?
Why not just:
signal_handler(int signum)
{
signo_quit = signum;
force_quit = true;
}
?
Konstantin
> + printf("Ports not started yet...\n");
> + printf("Bye...\n");
> + /* exit with the expected status */
> + signal(signum, SIG_DFL);
> + kill(getpid(), signum);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> int
> main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> @@ -2571,6 +2651,12 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> unsigned lcore_id;
> uint32_t n_tx_queue, nb_lcores;
> uint8_t portid, nb_rx_queue, queue, socketid;
> + uint8_t avail_ports;
> +
> + port_started = false;
> + force_quit = false;
> + signal(SIGINT, signal_handler);
> + signal(SIGTERM, signal_handler);
>
> /* init EAL */
> ret = rte_eal_init(argc, argv);
> @@ -2711,34 +2797,33 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> printf("\n");
>
> /* start ports */
> - for (portid = 0; portid < nb_ports; portid++) {
> - if ((enabled_port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0) {
> - continue;
> - }
> - /* Start device */
> - ret = rte_eth_dev_start(portid);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "rte_eth_dev_start: err=%d, port=%d\n",
> - ret, portid);
> + avail_ports = start_ports();
>
> - /*
> - * If enabled, put device in promiscuous mode.
> - * This allows IO forwarding mode to forward packets
> - * to itself through 2 cross-connected ports of the
> - * target machine.
> - */
> - if (promiscuous_on)
> - rte_eth_promiscuous_enable(portid);
> + if (!avail_ports) {
> + rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> + "All ports are disabled, please check portmask...\n");
> }
>
> check_all_ports_link_status((uint8_t)nb_ports, enabled_port_mask);
>
> + ret = 0;
> /* launch per-lcore init on every lcore */
> rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(main_loop, NULL, CALL_MASTER);
> RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(lcore_id) {
> - if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(lcore_id) < 0)
> - return -1;
> + if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(lcore_id) < 0) {
> + ret = -1;
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + /* stop ports */
> + stop_ports();
> + printf("Bye...\n");
> + /* exit with the expected status */
> + if (force_quit) {
> + signal(signo_quit, SIG_DFL);
> + kill(getpid(), signo_quit);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.5.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-29 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-25 2:37 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in DPDK examples Zhihong Wang
2015-12-25 2:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] app/test-pmd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in testpmd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-27 21:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-28 1:37 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-12-25 2:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l2fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l2fwd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-27 21:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-28 1:35 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-12-25 2:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l3fwd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-28 4:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in DPDK examples Qiu, Michael
2015-12-28 9:51 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-12-29 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Zhihong Wang
2015-12-29 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] app/test-pmd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in testpmd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-29 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] examples/l2fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l2fwd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-30 17:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-29 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] examples/l3fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l3fwd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-29 13:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2015-12-30 3:15 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-12-30 11:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-12-31 2:14 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-12-30 17:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-29 23:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in DPDK examples Zhihong Wang
2015-12-29 23:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] app/test-pmd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in testpmd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-29 23:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] examples/l2fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l2fwd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-29 23:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] examples/l3fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l3fwd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-30 13:37 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-12-31 1:44 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-12-31 2:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-31 2:20 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-12-30 21:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in DPDK examples Zhihong Wang
2015-12-30 21:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] app/test-pmd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in testpmd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-30 21:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] examples/l2fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l2fwd Zhihong Wang
2015-12-31 17:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-01-04 2:00 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-12-30 21:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] examples/l3fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l3fwd Zhihong Wang
2016-01-06 13:51 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-27 16:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in DPDK examples Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836ADDED8@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).